The Sirona TiBase, shown here with the abutment screw and scan body, is compatible with numerous popular implant systems. (DTI/Photo Sirona)
Jan 15, 2010 | EUROPE
Customized implant abutments: Sirona launches titanium bases
by Sirona Dental Systems, Inc.
BENSHEIM, Germany: Since December 2009, the Sirona inLab system is capable of producing customised zirconium oxide abutments for a wide range of popular implant systems. Following the successful launch with CAMLOG, Sirona has now introduced its own titanium bases for implant systems from Nobel Biocare, Straumann, Astra Tech, Friadent, Biomet 3i and Zimmer. The matching TiBase connector, supplied in a set with the scan body and abutment screw, is adhesively bonded to the milled and sintered zirconium oxide mesostructure.
With the aid of the new inLab 3D for Abutments V3.65, it is now possible to design a zirconium oxide abutment and matching crown in one single step. After the implant position using the inEos scanner is acquired, a fully anatomical crown can be designed in only one step. The mesostructure is created automatically by reducing the crown. Optimum flexibility is ensured by various adjustable parameter settings, e.g. telescope angle, shoulder width and gingival pressure.
Both components ― i.e. the zirconium oxide abutment and the feldspar or glass-ceramic crown ― can be milled on the inLab MC XL unit. Alternatively, users have the option of applying a veneer facing directly to a partially reduced abutment, as is the case with a conventional crown stump. The prefabricated inCoris ZI meso zirconium oxide blocks are rotation-secured. They are available in two different shades and in two connector sizes, which speeds up the milling process.
More information available from Sirona Dental Systems, Inc.
|
Cosmetic Tribune US No. 7, 2011
Hygiene Tribune US No. 3, 2012
Lab Tribune US No. 4, 2011
today international today Bulmedica/Buldental Sofia
Worlddental Daily Mexico City, 15 September
CAD/CAM France No. 1, 2011
DT Austria No. 5, 2012
DT Bulgaria and Macedonia No. 9, 2011
DT Canada No. 2, 2012
DT China No. 3, 2012
DT Croatia and BiH No. 1, 2012
DT Czech and Slovak Republic No. 1, 2012
DT France No. 5, 2012
DT Germany No. 5, 2012
DT Greece No. 2, 2012
DT Hungary No. 2, 2010
DT India No. 3, 2010
DT Italy No. 5, 2012
DT Korea No. 3, 2010
DT Latin America No. 5, 2012
DT Middle East and Africa No. 4, 2012
DT Netherlands No. 3, 2012
DT Poland No. 3, 2012
DT Romania and Moldavia No. 1, 2009
DT Russia No. 2, 2012
DT Serbia and Montenegro No. 1, 2012
DT Slovenia No. 1, 2012
DT Spain No. 2, 2012
DT Switzerland No. 5, 2012
DT Turkey No. 6, 2011
DT UK No. 13, 2012
DT US No. 4, 2012
Endo Tribune US No. 3, 2012
Implant Tribune Italy No. 1, 2012
Implant Tribune US No. 3, 2012
Ortho Tribune US No. 1, 2012
DT Asia Pacific No. 5, 2012
laser international No. 1, 2012
implants international No. 1, 2012
CAD/CAM international No. 1, 2012
roots international No. 1, 2012
cosmetic dentistry Italy No. 1, 2012
cosmetic dentistry international No. 1, 2012
CAD/CAM CE No. 3, 2011
CAD/CAM Italy No. 1, 2012
CAD/CAM Tribune US No. 2, 2011
cone beam CE No. 1, 2012
cosmetic dentistry CE No. 1, 2011
cosmetic dentistry France No. 1, 2011
cosmetic dentistry Poland No. 3+4, 2011
cosmetic dentistry UK No. 1, 2011
implants CE No. 2, 2012
implants Italy No. 1, 2012
implants Poland No. 1, 2012
implants UK No. 1, 2011
Lab Tribune Italy No. 1, 2012
laser CE No. 1, 2012
laser France No. 1, 2012
Ortho CE No. 1, 2012
roots CE No. 1, 2012
DT Bulgaria and Macedonia
DT Czech and Slovak Republic
DT Middle East and Africa
cosmetic dentistry international
cosmetic dentistry France
cosmetic dentistry Poland
|