The FDA is warning of handheld dental x-ray devices offered by online sellers outside the United States. (DTI/Photo Ed Bock/Shutterstock)
Feb 16, 2012 | USA
Handheld dental x-ray devices under investigation by FDA
by Daniel Zimmermann, DTI
SILVER SPRING, Md., USA: The Food and Drug Administration is advising dental professionals and veterinarians in the U.S. to stay away from handheld x-ray devices that are being offered by online sellers and shipped from abroad. At least one of these devices was recently found not to comply with safety standards and therefore to be potentially hazardous for dentists and patients, the organisation said.
FDA officials told Dental Tribune ONLINE that they are currently monitoring handheld dental x-ray units throughout the United States. Information about the device in question were recently send to the organisation by the Washington State Department of Health in Tumwater, Washington, which found during an inspection that a device purchased from a seller outside the country did not fulfill the FDA's x-ray performance standards.
The organisation said to have notified state regulators as well as dental and other health organisations about the potential health risks. Dentists will be also advised to verify whether the devices they are using have the required labelling and to contact state officials in case they are unsure if their device is safe.
The organisation refused to disclose further information about the extend of the problem or when and where these devices could have entered the country. However, Dental Tribune found that several devices produced in China and other countries are directly offered via internet to customers in the West including those in North America.
FDA-approved devices are currently available from a dozen manufacturers including Sigma, Digimed or Aribex. It's president and CFO Ken Kaufman welcomed the investigation while emphasising that these systems including the company's NOMAD unit have generally proven safe and effective.
"Clinician and patients safety have always been our number-one priority in developing and distributing our handheld x-ray device," he said. "We are dispappointed to learn that other manufacturers may not share a similiar perspective."
Aribex received FDA clearance for NOMAD in 2005. Since then, the company has been able to sell 8,000 pieces of its handheld system worldwide.
Research has found that radiation from handheld dental x-ray devices is below recommended levels and pose no greater risk that standard dental radiography like CT's.
|
Advertising
Cosmetic Tribune US No. 7, 2011
Hygiene Tribune US No. 3, 2012
Lab Tribune US No. 4, 2011
today international today Bulmedica/Buldental Sofia
Worlddental Daily Mexico City, 15 September
CAD/CAM France No. 1, 2012
DT Austria No. 5, 2012
DT Bulgaria and Macedonia No. 9, 2011
DT Canada No. 2, 2012
DT China No. 3, 2012
DT Croatia and BiH No. 1, 2012
DT Czech and Slovak Republic No. 1, 2012
DT France No. 5, 2012
DT Germany No. 5, 2012
DT Greece No. 2, 2012
DT Hungary No. 2, 2010
DT India No. 3, 2010
DT Italy No. 5, 2012
DT Korea No. 3, 2010
DT Latin America No. 5, 2012
DT Middle East and Africa No. 4, 2012
DT Netherlands No. 3, 2012
DT Poland No. 3, 2012
DT Romania and Moldavia No. 1, 2009
DT Russia No. 2, 2012
DT Serbia and Montenegro No. 1, 2012
DT Slovenia No. 1, 2012
DT Spain No. 2, 2012
DT Switzerland No. 5, 2012
DT Turkey No. 6, 2011
DT UK No. 13, 2012
DT US No. 4, 2012
Endo Tribune US No. 3, 2012
Implant Tribune Italy No. 1, 2012
Implant Tribune US No. 3, 2012
Ortho Tribune US No. 1, 2012
DT Asia Pacific No. 5, 2012
laser international No. 1, 2012
implants international No. 1, 2012
CAD/CAM international No. 1, 2012
roots international No. 1, 2012
cosmetic dentistry Italy No. 1, 2012
cosmetic dentistry international No. 1, 2012
CAD/CAM CE No. 3, 2011
CAD/CAM Italy No. 1, 2012
CAD/CAM Tribune US No. 2, 2011
cone beam CE No. 1, 2012
cosmetic dentistry CE No. 1, 2011
cosmetic dentistry France No. 1, 2012
cosmetic dentistry Poland No. 3+4, 2011
cosmetic dentistry UK No. 1, 2011
implants CE No. 2, 2012
implants Italy No. 1, 2012
implants Poland No. 1, 2012
implants UK No. 1, 2011
Lab Tribune Italy No. 1, 2012
laser CE No. 1, 2012
laser France No. 1, 2012
Ortho CE No. 1, 2012
roots CE No. 1, 2012
DT Bulgaria and Macedonia
DT Czech and Slovak Republic
DT Middle East and Africa
cosmetic dentistry international
cosmetic dentistry France
cosmetic dentistry Poland
|
1 COMMENT
Thank you for providing additional information for your readers beyond what was announced by the FDA. However, your readers should know that the level of operator radiation exposure from handheld x-ray devices varies significantly between manufacturers and equipment styles. Also, your closing statement that radiation from handheld devices poses no greater risk than "standard dental radiography like CT" is a bit misleading. CT exposes the patient to MUCH more radiation than intra-oral radiography. Any handheld device that has comparable exposure to CT should not be used, as lower exposure levels are easily achievable.