Oct 21, 2010 | EUROPE
UK dental students could face higher university fees
LONDON, UK: Members of the House of Lords have recommended an increase in university tuition fees in the UK. If the proposed plans go ahead there could be serious implications for students all over the country. Along with the proposed changes to the system with regards to budget cuts, universities across Britain will lose a proportion of state-funding in an effort to try and reduce the country’s ever-increasing deficit.
It is currently unclear whether the government will consider going ahead with Lord Browne’s review; however, whatever decision the government decides to make is likely to involve increasing university fees.
The problem that arises with the proposed changes will have far greater implications for dental and medical students, as their courses tend to be significantly longer than the usual three years. Recently, figures of £7,000 per year are being discussed; however there is also talk of an unlimited annual fee to be determined by individual universities. If these changes are brought into action then students are going to potentially leave university with a staggering debt of £100,000.
As it stands, many students are struggling to find a job after graduation due to the economic climate, resulting in interest piling on top of their student loans at an uncontrollable rate; this undoubtedly will put off future students.
The implications that this could have on society has a recipe for disaster. A decrease in the number of future dental and medical university students could result in a sudden shortage of trained professionals in the future and could ultimately affect economic growth. As Lord Browne stated in his review: “Analysis submitted to the Review suggests that, in the UK between 2000 and 2007, the increase in employed university graduates accounted for six per cent of growth in the private sector (measured by the extra wages they earned as a result of being graduates) or £4.2bn of extra output.”
According to the Independent Review of Higher Education Funding and Student Finance the current system puts a “limit on the level of investment for higher education” and it has been suggested that the country’s education standard is at risk of “falling behind rival countries.” The proposals will introduce a greater investment: students are going to be persuaded that by paying more in they will get more out. Reported cuts throughout the economic sector have further made the proposed fee increase an ever more pressing subject; university budgets will be cut by £1bn, affecting research funds and student support, and it is feared that worse may follow. Reports in the media suggest that the coalition government aim to cut £82m from university budgets next year and that the number of student places available is to be halved.
It is believed that if the proposed changes are adhered to, selected universities, where students compete to get a place, would end up charging higher fees for the privilege. However, through all the speculation, those who are closest to the students have generally said that ‘dental and medical students are guaranteed a job that is well paid and because of this they leave university in a better position to pay back their fees.’ Dental Tribune contacted various dental schools who were reluctant to comment before the announcement of the Comprehensive Spening Review.
|
Cosmetic Tribune US No. 7, 2011
Hygiene Tribune US No. 3, 2012
Lab Tribune US No. 4, 2011
today international today Bulmedica/Buldental Sofia
Worlddental Daily Mexico City, 15 September
CAD/CAM France No. 1, 2012
DT Austria No. 5, 2012
DT Bulgaria and Macedonia No. 9, 2011
DT Canada No. 2, 2012
DT China No. 3, 2012
DT Croatia and BiH No. 1, 2012
DT Czech and Slovak Republic No. 1, 2012
DT France No. 5, 2012
DT Germany No. 5, 2012
DT Greece No. 2, 2012
DT Hungary No. 2, 2010
DT India No. 3, 2010
DT Italy No. 5, 2012
DT Korea No. 3, 2010
DT Latin America No. 5, 2012
DT Middle East and Africa No. 4, 2012
DT Netherlands No. 3, 2012
DT Poland No. 3, 2012
DT Romania and Moldavia No. 1, 2009
DT Russia No. 2, 2012
DT Serbia and Montenegro No. 1, 2012
DT Slovenia No. 1, 2012
DT Spain No. 2, 2012
DT Switzerland No. 5, 2012
DT Turkey No. 6, 2011
DT UK No. 13, 2012
DT US No. 4, 2012
Endo Tribune US No. 3, 2012
Implant Tribune Italy No. 1, 2012
Implant Tribune US No. 3, 2012
Ortho Tribune US No. 1, 2012
DT Asia Pacific No. 5, 2012
laser international No. 1, 2012
implants international No. 1, 2012
CAD/CAM international No. 1, 2012
roots international No. 1, 2012
cosmetic dentistry Italy No. 1, 2012
cosmetic dentistry international No. 1, 2012
CAD/CAM CE No. 3, 2011
CAD/CAM Italy No. 1, 2012
CAD/CAM Tribune US No. 2, 2011
cone beam CE No. 1, 2012
cosmetic dentistry CE No. 1, 2011
cosmetic dentistry France No. 1, 2012
cosmetic dentistry Poland No. 3+4, 2011
cosmetic dentistry UK No. 1, 2011
implants CE No. 2, 2012
implants Italy No. 1, 2012
implants Poland No. 1, 2012
implants UK No. 1, 2011
Lab Tribune Italy No. 1, 2012
laser CE No. 1, 2012
laser France No. 1, 2012
Ortho CE No. 1, 2012
roots CE No. 1, 2012
DT Bulgaria and Macedonia
DT Czech and Slovak Republic
DT Middle East and Africa
cosmetic dentistry international
cosmetic dentistry France
cosmetic dentistry Poland
|