Discussions

November 7, 2012 Study suggests dentists cause implant failure
  • jim snell, camarillo, california Apr 18, 2013 | 10:49:48 PM

    I had a crown and tooth fail so decided to get implant plus prothesis. Implant at SUrgical Dentist went fine, like clock work - no issues. When I went in to my regular dentist I have used for a number of yeras has been extremely frustrating. First step, prothesis did not mount and seemed incorrect. Dnetist said he had been sent the wrong one. Dental mechanic who has run a lab said that was crazy and not likely. Next step, I am called in and he set about to install. It seemed very tight but they adjusted the clearances on side and top and tooth felt fine. When he put tooth in prior to last step and unglued as I was advised, he pushed it on and it made a loud click. Everything seemed correct. He next tries to remove it so he could glue it on and was unable to remove. It was decided to leave it in and If it came off; I could bring it back in and have it glued. I am warm body person and have lots of saliva = cool in my mouth. My guess is that this prothesis is clamped on the implant stud like a steel tire on a steam engine driver wheel due to interference grab. Is this normal and are tolerances so tight this action occures or is this a mistake from dental lab making prothesis. Please advise

  • Val Miller, Culver City, CA, USA Apr 3, 2014 | 4:34:24 AM

    Interesting article. I have had 4 successful dental implants by two different dentists. I lost teeth nos. 3 and 4 and then 12 in the last five months. I was lured into going into a "discount dentist". Two implants were placed on my first visit, nos. 3 and 4. Within 5 weeks no. 3 was 'vibrating' in my mouth. It was subsequently removed and a bone graft placed in the socket. No. 4 (no bone graft) is hopefully to have a crown put on in six weeks. No. 12 was painful from the moment it was placed. A bone graft was done at the time of implant and the membrane fell out (along with the graft) three days later. An infection developed and after 6 weeks the implant was removed. The dentist insists that the adjacent tooth, no. 11 needed a root canal - that is why the implant failed. I have had half of a root canal finished and if I stop taking antibiotics the area becomes throbbing and painful. I really wonder since the tooth had no symptoms before r.c. if the implant didn't damage the roots of no. 11 and/or the failed bone graft caused an infection. Guess I will never know but I will have another dentist implant no. 12. This dentist wants to do another bone graft and wait a whole five months before trying another implant. I would rather not wait that long and think that another dentist could place it more exactly with something other than a one dimensional x-ray.

Join the Discussion 2 Comments
April 27, 2012 Implant failure may be related to bisphosphonate use
  • william richter,saginaw,michigan Apr 30, 2012 | 3:08:14 AM

    I had such a failure, the patient had 4 successful implants on the mandible, then started foxamaz for her low bone density. All her implants failed, the state board in Michigan said there was no connection. I even ask the U of M perio department to do some bone tests on her after I had a bone slough. They never ever had the descency to write me back!!!!

  • dental implants uk Jan 4, 2013 | 12:26:29 PM

    That's good if Neither the quantity nor the duration of bisphosphonate use was evaluated..Well all her implants failed, the state board in Michigan said there was no connection. ..

Join the Discussion 2 Comments
March 22, 2012 Dentists' irritant named Allergen of the Year
  • Louise Guest RN, Canberra, Australia Aug 4, 2012 | 10:30:23 AM

    I work in a specialist skin care clinic.I have a client who is a dentist, he came to me with dermatitis on his face. I suggested that he may have an allergy to facial masks. I am glad to find that this is probably true. It was just a hunch! I am not sure if it is the actual mask or the allergens in the air that are building up in the moist environment under the mask? A very unfortunate problem as he must keep wearing the masks. I am not sure what to suggest to him?

  • Dr Viviane Leventhal Sydney Australia . Jun 24, 2012 | 8:23:24 PM

    About 17 yrs ago , I had such a patient come to me who was a Dental Prosthetist & who was become allergic to many thing and was suffering from chronic fatigue as well .We traced it back to exposure to methyl methacrylate in an non-ventilated environment .She was unable to work for a considerable length of time .Became allergic to medications , dairy wheat and many other foods & products , as well as volatiles such as perfumes & chemicals . She also suffered a second episode when there was a leak from the container of the material that was kept in the special refrigerator of her next dental lab. I have continued to treat her as well as refer her to other therapists for treatments .It has been a very long & eventful educational experience & we often discussed when would the profession become aware of these harmful effects and start to warn its members . She has been ahead of me in her research of this particular condition & and its treatments , though I studied Environmental medicine with ACNEM , the Australian College of Nutritional & Environmental medicine .I am delighted to see that the Dental Profession has reached that milestone as now the Medical Profession is training more & more Doctors & other practitioners in diagnosing & treating toxic exposures .

Join the Discussion 2 Comments
March 7, 2012 Saudi dentists receive U.S. patent for novel soft tissue augmentation tech
  • Gregori M. Kurtzman, DDS, MAGD, FACD, DICOI, DADIA/ USA Mar 14, 2012 | 11:14:36 PM

    The tunnel technique has been published on from a number of sources using acellular dermal matrix since the late 1990's. I am curious how somneone can patent something that has been published in the past (prior art) and why the US patent office is issuing patents for technques.

Join the Discussion 1 Comment
February 28, 2012 Intraoral device maneuvers electrical wheelchair
  • Sonya, London,UK Mar 2, 2012 | 2:07:40 PM

    WOW!!! Have a disabled daughter who is fully dependant (unfortuantely does not have good tongue control) but the implications are amazing!!! Fantastic work being done by all involved. Would be good if it could be widely availabe to income brackets and countries.

  • Yves Pierru, Frejus, France Mar 2, 2012 | 8:00:25 PM

    What about problems and teeth with piercings ?

Join the Discussion 2 Comments
February 16, 2012 Handheld dental x-ray devices under investigation by FDA
  • Clark Turner, Orem/Utah/USA Feb 17, 2012 | 5:28:07 PM

    Thank you for providing additional information for your readers beyond what was announced by the FDA. However, your readers should know that the level of operator radiation exposure from handheld x-ray devices varies significantly between manufacturers and equipment styles. Also, your closing statement that radiation from handheld devices poses no greater risk than "standard dental radiography like CT" is a bit misleading. CT exposes the patient to MUCH more radiation than intra-oral radiography. Any handheld device that has comparable exposure to CT should not be used, as lower exposure levels are easily achievable.

Join the Discussion 1 Comment
December 15, 2011 Study reveals that post-endo pain has different sources
  • Modern Age Dentistry, West Hills, CA, USA Dec 15, 2011 | 7:57:44 PM

    This is an interesting article. Its amazing this study was taken over a 60 year period, and to only occur in a 5 to 6 %, thats a very small percentage overall

Join the Discussion 1 Comment
May 18, 2011 Interview: 'There seems to be no limit to what tissue we can regenerate'
  • Tony, NYC, USA May 26, 2011 | 4:43:45 AM

    In regard to "dental waste," how can a person who has no teeth at all regenerate a whole tooth or parts of a tooth if there are no stem cells to build from? Or can dental stem cells be donated from another body? Please explain this to me.

Join the Discussion 1 Comment
January 7, 2011 Specialists quarrel over 'single file endo'
  • Bojidar Kafelov, Bulgaria Jan 10, 2011 | 11:11:57 AM

    Here in Bulgaria we also have problems with refferal! Few GP reffer patients to endodontic specialists. Other GP simply say that the tooth was inevetably damaged and has to be extracted and they place an implant! I don't understand why do we search the most simple ways to handle such complex problem such as endodontic treatment - it's never about one file or one guttapercha point! Every tooth, every canal even is different from the previous...Then how to clean and shape those differences with one file, even with the "breakthrogh" design of Wave One File or Reciproc? I hope that endodontists around the world have enough brains to decide where the truth lies! Best regards to all, Bojidar Kafelov, DDS

  • dr sameer jadhav,india Jan 7, 2011 | 5:55:19 PM

    its good system only thing is the cost of the file,reusability, and new motor ,are the only points to cosider otherwise reciprocating files sounds promissing

  • Julian Webber, UK Jan 12, 2011 | 2:41:44 PM

    I am on the WaveOne development team and read this article and the comments with interest. Reciproc and WaveOne have a slightly different sizing. WaveOne is 21:06, 25:08 and 40:08. Reciproc advises the file is chosen after an appraisal of the radiograph and radiographic dimensions. In addition, they feel the Reciproc file can be taken to length without any prior glide path management. WaveOne advocates a glide path, albeit it minimum 1. if 8/10 are tight then use WaveOne Small (21:06) 2. if 10 can easily be taken to length then use WaveOne Primary (25:08) 3. if 20 or bigger then use WaveOne Large (40:08) WaveOne Primary will be the main work horse. Gauging foramen diameter at the end of the shaping procedure may indicate the need to go the next size shaping file. It is mainly a single file technique but there are occasions when two files are used. Of course we all appreciate that they are single use. The plastic on the handle will expand on placement into the sterilizer so cannot be inserted into the handpiece. The motor reciprocates in reverse. The files have a reverse flute design. The motor can be set up for continuous rotation CW and CCW. You can brush with the files just like ProTaper for increased coronal enlargement. Usually the first 2/3 can be prepared, the working length reconfirmed and then the WaveOne is taken to length. Yes, it is simple and yes it is quick. It is up to us as teachers to emphasise the importance of irrigation. Remember, files shape and irrigants clean. This concept is the same for all preparation techniques. How anyone can knock reciprocating systems because they are too quick and cynically one file is beyond me. And yes, a single file technique will excite the generalists because of costs (far cheaper than SAF) and because of speed. The speed issue is of course concerning because whilst we can hammer home the message on the importance of irrigation, sadly many will miss the point and go straight to fill with a great possibility for failure. That is the problem with every file system. All current systems are quick and no emphasis on irrigation so why "knock" WaveOne and Reciproc. They are no different.

  • Matt Swenson Jan 24, 2011 | 5:49:19 AM

    Excellent individual points by all—The endodontic importance of canal shaping, fidelity, cleaning, disinfecting, patient care, final outcome, etc. But, many of these points only represent a single point in a much more complex treatment. In my opinion these and many other similar endodontic arguments miss the mark by not looking at "full circle" endodontic treatment (treatment planning; long term prognosis; access; shaping; cleaning; and obturation). With the above in mind, shouldn't the real question be, "can single file endodontic systems, such as SAF and WaveOne, work as part of full circle endodontic care?" If yes then the next question to consider amy be, "is that treatment approach providing the best, most effective care for the patient?" Thanks! -Matt Swenson/Your Dental Edge

  • Ian Kerr/UK Feb 9, 2011 | 11:58:41 PM

    As a general dentist with a passion for endodontics I am excited by each new development in endodontic training and equipment, especially when these are driven by a desire to improve outcome for our patients. Where developments are driven primarily by a desire to speed up the process I have less interest. "One file systems" may make shaping marginally quicker but if they do not offer greater canal wall contact or if they distort the canal anatomy more than previous systems then we have gained little more than a couple of minutes of working time. If a guide path is still required along with coronal flaring then just how much time we have saved is questionable. Any system that enhances our ability to irrigate a canal system more fully is likely to improve outcome and is worth considering no matter how many files are required. Endodontic training needs to emphasis the comprehensive nature of planning (both endodontic and restorative) and the biological nature of the condition. Understanding the 3D aspect of the canal anatomy is essential and should be an important part of training. Predictable endodontic outcomes are achievable by all dentists with appropriate training and adequate time in practice. Any new system that assists this goal should be applauded.

  • Esteban Ulate-- Costa Rica Feb 3, 2011 | 6:13:05 AM

    FIRST OF ALL I WANT TO MENTION I REALLY SUPPORT ONE FILE SYSTEMS AS THEY STAND FOR NEW IDEAS AND THE INTRODUCTION OF NEW TECHNOLOGY BUT.. THE TRUTH ABOUT ONE FILE SYSTEMS IS THAT THEY ARE REALLY NOT ONE FILE SYSTEMS. AS JULIA MENTIONS YOU NEED AT LEAST A GLIDE PATH AND A 2/3 CORONAL PREPARATION (WHICH CAN BE ACHIEVED WITH ADDITIONAL ROTARY FILES). I MENTION THIS NOT TO CRITICISE THE SYSTEM, (ANY CRITICAL BUYER WITH GENERAL KNOWLEDGE IN ENDODONTICS SHOULD KNOW THIS) BUT TO POINT OUT HOW FUTILE THIS DISCUSSION REALLY IS. WHEN A NEW SYSTEM IS INTRODUCED, WE AS ENDODONTISTS SHOULD CONCENTRATE ON MORE IMPORTANT CHARACTERISTICS OF NITI FILES . FOR INSTANCE; ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF RECIPROCATING SYSTEMS, FILE SEPARATION, FILE CAPACITY TO SUCCESFULLY PREPARE ALL CANAL WALLS AND THE LAST ISSUE SHOULD BE HOW QUICK THE TREATMENT WILL BECOME. OUR RESPONSABILITY IS TO TELL GENERAL DENTISTS OUR CONCLUSSIONS AND ROOT FOR THE BEST SYSTEM. FINALLY, IS REALLY SHAMEFUL FOR ME AS AN ENDODONTIST TO READ HOW IMPORTANT THE TOPIC OF SINGLE PREPARATION FILE HAS BECOME. THERE ARE MORE IMPORTANT THINGS TO FOCUS!! BEST REGARDS

  • Stephen Cohen Jan 20, 2011 | 5:41:57 PM

    Posted by: Christian Diegritz, Germany — Jan 12, 2011 1:27:03 PM Dr. Diegritz posted very thoughtful and cogent comments. Readers should follow Dr. Diegritz's advice.

  • Christian Diegritz, Germany Jan 12, 2011 | 1:27:03 PM

    No Canal is round! Looking at MicroCT images—no matter if you take a look at Brown & Herbranson, Ove Peters or Frank Paqué—when do we FINALLY come to the conclusion and accept that: 1. We will NEVER be able to clean all canal walls with a machine driven instrument no matter of the design of it. 2. AP is about KILLING BUGS. When do we finally change our perspectives from a machinist to a medical professional? Ah yes, I forgot, there is no money behind it and microbiology books and Siqueira papers are “boring”. It is a DISEASE we are fighting against every single day and not a beautiful looking fine white line in the X-ray. HEALING SHOULD BE OUR GOAL. FIGHT THE BIOFILM and RESPECT THE ANATOMY. In my opinion, we should stop bashing about these new systems. No one reading this will ever use just one file trying to clean and shape and believe all the “propaganda”. The real problem I have with this system is that it reduces the amount of irrigation and disinfection, which is why I am more impressed with the SAF System. We should all try it out if it may help us in our protocol. Because everyone is talking about the file and not the idea of reciprocation. Be open minded. With regards, Christian

  • Claudio Farnararo Jun 9, 2011 | 12:52:28 PM

    This new system it's incredible, I started using it since it came out and the primary results are amazing. Of course I must said that it's impossible to think in the complexity of root canal system of a single file endo. But really the 21.06 goes in most canals, and the I believe that all the Endodontic system in future will convert to this new movement. But if I shape a single molar with just that instrument and in few seconds, and then usa a couple of more hand instruments to fnish my preparation...what's wrong with that? Like Julian webber said I never heard an opinion leader saying : single endo file. It will depends a lot from the phylosopy of treatment, with the next exit of finally a thermafil without carrier i say that it coincide with this new technology. I strongly believe that when we will have a system of obturation that allow us to have warm guttapercha (soon the guttacore) there will be no more need and reason of brushing movemnet.... the only actual reason it's to make space for plugger ( we could also discuss of the last millemeter of guttapercha whatever warm system you use..) it's a nonsense from my point of view.

  • Barry Musikant, NY/USA Jun 22, 2011 | 7:52:05 PM

    I call a reciprocating single file instrument system a rationalization for NiTi's weaknesses because pure rotation too often is accompanied by the anxiety of separating an instrument. There are those who deny this reality, but having used rotary systems myself in the past, having taught thousands of dentists who voice the same concerns and a perusal of the thousands of articles that discuss the breakage of rotary NiTi instruments, it a reality that we have had to cope with. The very fact that these systems have been developed is testament to the concerns stated above. Their answer, however, imo,is inadequate. The literature clearly states that minimum apical preparations to a 35 are recommended. This is not accomplished. the research also points out that 08 tapers do not increase the effectiveness of irrigation when the apical preparation is less than 35, yet at the same time can undermine the thin roots of oval canals in the walls constituting the minor diameter. NiTi is a metal that always wants to rebound to the straight position making it increasingly likely to selectively shape to the outside wall of curved canals. By minimizing the tip size of these instruments the manufacturers reduce the effect of this property, but they do it at the expense of thorough cleansing. Most important, this is not a truly reciprocating system. It is a hybrid one that will still result in 200 full rotations per minute. While the 30º counterclockwise motion employed in this system will reduce the torsional stress generated by the handpiece, it does nothing to prevent cyclic fatigue leaving the instruments vulnerable to separation even though they are meant for single use only. 30º reciprocation, unlike the hybrid system used with the systems above, virtually eliminates all torsional stress and cyclic fatigue. Used with vertically oriented relieved flutes, these alternative instruments accomplish full shaping to 35 and beyond without any concern for separation. Their ability to adapt to canal shapes either by recording the curve as they negotiate thru the length of the canal or by prebending and manually negotiating the most severe curves gives these instruments the ability to fully cleanse canals without fear of instrument separation. My own personal opinion is that the various iterations of NiTi would never have occured if we had used relieved stainless steel reamers, rather than K-files, from the start. All that has happened with NiTi is a constant evolution for the dollars to keep flowing to the major manufactuers as they attempt to come up with ways to use these expensive instruments without separation and limiting the costs at least enough so they will be bearable to the dentists who are being asked to purchase them.

  • raef sherif, Alexandria, Egypt Oct 28, 2011 | 1:10:10 AM

    No matter it's one file shaping or many files shaping , the idea of canal preparation is to open a convenient pathway for effective irrigation. Single file canal prep will save more time for irrigation and cleaning , which is waht we have to do and focus on. finally it's up to the endodontist to add his signature on his preparation with any instruments he like. Wave one and reciproc will surely open a new way for a new generation of NiTi files , and a new instrument needs a good mind to use it in the best way.

  • Chirag shukla(mum)India. Dec 29, 2011 | 6:34:45 AM

    In the ever growing and evolving field of human sciences the horizon for Endodontics and complete endodontic treatment seems far fetched and something of profound imagination, and the idea around the globe that we may just have achived it through systems like receproc,SAF,Wave one are really absurd.How can we really forget the concepts and principles Endodontics.A single file for a root cannal treatment aren't we forgetting that files shape and irrigating solutions clean the systems, we achieve the shaping with these instruments in 15 mins max but what about cleaning the systems .this is where we need to focus look back at the past mistakes and teach and train our colleagues and students about the importance of the most vital aspect of endodontics, that is cleaning,we need to understand the fact ourselves that files shape and irrigating solutions clean.Every new thing that is introduced recieves it's share of criticism and SAF receproc and Waveone are no different.All these instruments are good in their own limits but are we going to be sure that we have thouroughly disinfected the system before obturation.Truly if the answer is NO then we need to be critical of the use of such instruments.A 15min endo really should'nt be our aim while we sit to perform an endodontic treatment,But complete Endodontics should be our aim,Agian coming back to the point I personally don't feel that wave really does anything different than its previous version of pro-tapers,in true sense it is not a reciprocating file the principle is loose based on a kown concept of reciprocation by rooane,and it can be more agrressive if not used with caution.

  • Mohamed Salman Jan 3, 2012 | 9:02:19 PM

    Totally agree with Cohen "Full circle endodontic treatment", single file instumentation achieves the mechanical objectives only, what about the biological objectives??go to the next step in the the cycle.....cleaning... take additional 2-3 minutes for active irrigation and here is a study I will present in the next PAN ARAB ENDODONTICS in Dubai next week. SEM evaluation of root canal debridement after single file F2 ProTaper and EndoActivator irrigation Various single file techniques have recently been introduced to the endodontic market. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of single file F2 ProTaper instrumentation in a reciprocating hand piece and EndoActivator irrigation for root canal cleaning. Fourty extracted single rooted human maxillary and mandibular teeth were shaped with F2 ProTaper (#25 .08) only in a reciprocating handpiece of an ATR motor following the suggestion of Yared (2008). The canals were then treated as follows (n = 10 canals per group); group I (control) irrigated with 5.25 NaOCl using 27 gauge needle, groups II, III and IV received additional one, two or three minutes activation by the EndoActivator with the tip #20 .02 respectively. Roots were split and examined with SEM. The presence or absence of debris and smear layer on coronal, middle and apical thirds was evaluated by using a 5-grade scoring system at x200 and x1000 magnification, respectively. Data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Activation of 5.25% NaOCl for either two or three minutes significantly reduced debris and smear layer scores compared to control and one minute activation (P < 0.05).There were no significant difference between two or three minutes activation. One minute EndoActivator irrigation did not enhance debris or smear layer removal. Conclusion: Under the conditions of this study two minutes EndoActivator irrigation is required after single file F2 ProTaper in a reciprocating handpiece to improve root canal debridement. Do not always believe radiograph and company marketing brochures as well

  • p.d. fox, split, croatia Feb 10, 2012 | 5:08:28 AM

    Here they go again, discussions about pro's and con's concerning endodontics are like searching for a non existing root canal. Preparation of the root canal, after opening and creating a glide path, mainly serves the possibility to reach the apex. There and only there shape and size do matter, the rest of the canal could as well be prepared using a banana, if it would fit. Cleaning and disinfecting the walls of the infected root canal can only be completed by using chemical/medical agents. Any discussion about turning, twisting or wiggling is a waste of time, better spent on the golf yard. Compliments to Christian Diegritz, who shows common sense. And to those who wish to discus this matter with me (not in any way involved in dentistry anymore), mail me at pimdevosXgmail.com. Wishing you all predictable results, Pim

  • Dr.Mathew India Feb 8, 2012 | 7:11:05 PM

    Here in India, Dentsply came with protaper and anthogyr, since the nitti files started breaking, they came out with x-S-mart, which do was a fialure, now the reciprocation, that concept is good, but a single file to perform root canal cant take it much, since root morphology keeps on variying, and not constant. Last eight months back i started using EDS reciprocating system, which is much better than all the systems, in BMP as well as flexibility and fracture resistance. Regards Mathew

  • jeremy magruder, USA May 1, 2012 | 7:01:11 PM

    I have attended two different continuing education courses in which the waveone system was presented. Using only one file does sound like a scam on the surface until you learn the research that the waveone technology is based upon. There are a few auxiliary components that can be used like a single glide path file and a single hand file( to confirm canal patency between irrigating) . Also, there are 3 available files but usually only one of the files is needed per canal. In my opinion based on research presented, it is a very good system. The canal is prepared conservatively and with precision. Also, research indicated that the file will only rarely separate. Sceptics of the waveone system should take a look at the research before judging.

  • Dr Parikshit Bhalerao,India May 28, 2013 | 11:32:01 AM

    I see a slightly different problem in this whole situation. The Protaper files (though more in number required to finish a case) are designed to work on different segments of canals. They make sure that the priniciples of Crown-down technique are realised. However,the way this Single file is marketed concerns me a bit, particularly in hands of relatively less experienced general dentist. It is been sometimes seen as a magic wand which can finish a molar in a couple of minutes. I think the Single files come with even more responsibility on part of the dentist to make sure all parts of the canals are worked upon to obtain a continous tapering preparation,which then will facilitate the irrigant to adequately work in all the areas. It definitely saves a lot of time needed for changing the files..... however the saved time must be utilised for increased irrigation time,through ultrasonic activation. Lastly the term "Single file" technique is the biggest misnomer and highly misleading for the inexperienced. Because as we all know canals are anything but round needing than more than one instrument to shape. The marketing teams of all the respected companies should be more honest because the failures may take some time to surface. Regards.

Join the Discussion 17 Comments
June 19, 2009 Americans support dental coverage in health care reforms
  • Danny O'Keefe Jackson,MS USA Nov 18, 2009 | 7:13:48 PM

    I am sorry for your disability and appreciate your 25 yrs of work. I hate the "illegals" situation. They are criminals breaking the law. They are taking benefits away from Americans citizens. Where do you live ? Are you a member of a church ? They often help their members. There is a church backed clinic that i work in that helps people in your situation. I listen to my patients and try to work out situations. Did you have a regular dentist and talk with him about how he might help ? We have a dental school in our town that can help some patients while working with students. There is an organization called Donated Dental Services that many dentists participate in.

  • Carol Dobson Jul 11, 2009 | 4:06:45 AM

    Here's the problem with Medicaid as it now stands. It is based on formularies of the late 1960's. In the late '60's, my monthly S.S.D. payments would have been a tidy sum. Medicaid's "spend-down" or "surplus" rules are based in these old formularies. With my S.S.D. payments being what they are, this so-called monthly "Spend-Down" I would have to pay is currently $265.00 Ergo: I have to pay $265. before Medicaid pays for anything -- like dental work. As a restult, I have had no routine care for several years and now need six extractions, a full upper plate and lower partial plate. I recently had a dental emergency which took me to a hospital emergency room and their clinic performed the extraction. When I asked about the ball-park cost of what I would need to restore my teeth, the estimate was $1,120. (This is one of the best estimates I've gotten.) I would have to go into my rent budget for three months to do this -- and then face eviction. If would have been better off if I never worked a day in my life or came to this country as an illegal immigrant; they are covered. That's what one gets for working twenty five years and becoming disabled, I guess. 'Seem fair to you?

  • Abe Dumanis, D.S., D.D.S.,Skokie, IL, USA Jan 1, 2010 | 1:34:00 AM

    When Russian comedian Yakov Smernov had been asked: "Is it true that the medicine in the former Soviet Union is free?" the answer was : "Shure, and you get what you paid for". Is it not the American expression : "There is not such thing as the free lunch."? Why is it absolutely necessary for some people to go through their own experience in order to face the reality?

  • Janie Graham, Hillsboro/USA Sep 2, 2011 | 4:22:19 PM

    I think it's so important to get some kind of dental coverage in health care reforms. I think dental care needs to be thought of as being more medical because major problems and decay in the teeth can totally affect other parts of the body. It just all combines together. I know my <a href="http://lesmile.net">dentist</a> wishes his patients could have more coverage so that he could make sure everybody has good teeth.

  • Elizabeth Horton Apr 16, 2012 | 10:01:05 PM

    My problem is that, when I contact the State of Delaware, they can tell me of nowhere in the county of Sussex where I can get help based on my income (retirement and SS). I find myself in the middle. I can pay my bassic bills but no dentist will see me unless I can give them cash up front. My front teeth are rotting. I treat my pain with tylennol. I am ashamed to visit my grandchildren because of my tooth decay. I don't know how this is affecting the rest of my body. I have gone to federal websites-Barack Obama, the Vice-President's. Joe Biden, my former State Representative, but they offer no easy way to contact them about this issue. I feel abondomed by my state and federal government. Please help me-give me a way to speak. I know that the press is owned by corporate america. Is there an alternative?

Join the Discussion 5 Comments