Amalgam: Gone for good? By Prof. Falk Schwendicke

• 1.Shimada Y, Hokii Y, Yamamoto K, et al. Evaluation of hardness increase of GIC restorative surface in saliva. Clin Oral Invest (2015) 19:1701–1754.
• 2.Gurgan S, Kutuk ZB, Ergin E, Oztas SS, Cakir FY. Clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system: a 6-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(7):2335-43.
• 3.Klinke T, Daboul A, Turek A, Frankenberger R, Hickel R, Biffar R. Clinical performance during 48 months of two current glass ionomer restorative systems with coatings: a randomized clinical trial in the field. Trials. 2016;17(1):239.
• 4.Friedl K, Hiller KA, Friedl KH. Clinical performance of a new glass ionomer based restoration system: a retrospective cohort study. Dent Mater. 2011;27(10):1031-7.
• 5.Schwendicke F, Gostemeyer G, Blunck U, Paris S, Hsu LY, Tu YK. Directly Placed Restorative Materials: Review and Network Meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2016;95(6):613-22.
• 6.Koc Vural U, Meral E, Ergin E, Gurgan S. Twenty-four-month clinical performance of a glass hybrid restorative in non-carious cervical lesions of patients with bruxism: a split-mouth, randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(3):1229-1238.
• 7.Schwendicke F, Müller A, Seifert T, Jeggle-Engbert LM, Paris S, Göstemeyer G. Glass hybrid versus composite for non-carious cervical lesions: Survival, restoration quality and costs in randomized controlled trial after 3 years. J Dent. 2021;110:103689.
• 8.Balkaya H, Arslan S. A Two-year Clinical Comparison of Three Different Restorative Materials in Class II Cavities. Oper Dent. 2020;45(1):e32-e42
• 9.Schwendicke F, Rossi JG, Krois J, Basso M, Peric T, Turkun LS, et al. Cost-effectiveness of glass hybrid versus composite in a multi-country randomized trial. J Dent. 2021;107:103614.
• 10.Miletić I, Baraba A, Basso M, Pulcini MG, Marković D, Perić T, et al. Clinical Performance of a Glass-Hybrid System Compared with a Resin Composite in the Posterior Region: Results of a 2-year Multicenter Study. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(3):235-47.
• 11.Schwendicke F, Basso M, Markovic D, Turkun LS, Miletić I. Long-term cost-effectiveness of glass hybrid versus composite in permanent molars. J Dent. 2021;112:103751.
• 12.Expert Committee on Selection and Use of Essential Medicines. Glass ionomer cement – dental caries https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/essential-medicines/2021-eml-expert-committee/expert-reviews/a16_gic_rev1.pdf?sfvrsn=660f8835_82021 (Accessed Sept 16, 2022).
• 13.WHO. Expert Committee on Selection and Use of Essential Medicines https://www.who.int/groups/expert-committee-on-selection-and-use-of-essential-medicines (Accessed Sept 16, 2022)
• 14.FDI World Dental Federation. 2019; Carious Lesions and First Restorative Treatment. https://www.fdiworlddental.org/carious-lesions-and-first-restorative-treatment. (Accessed Sept 14, 2022).
• 15.FDI World Dental Federation. Carious lesions and first restorative treatment: Adopted by the General Assembly: September 2019, San Francisco, United States of America. Int Dent J. 2020; 70: 5–6.