Fully digital full arch? Continued advancements in full-arch implant restoration by Drs Isaac D. Tawil & Scott D. Ganz

• 1.Ganz SD, Tawil I. Full-arch implant surgical and restorative considerations: utilizing a full template guidance technique. Dent Today. 2019 Sep [cited 2024 Mar 13];38(9):72–8. Available from: https://www.dentistrytoday.com/september-2019/articles/10597.
• 2.Ganz SD, Tawil I. Autologous tooth structure as an adjunct grafting modality. Dent Today. 2021 Oct 22 [cited 2024 Mar 13]. Available from: https://www.dentistrytoday.com/autologous-tooth-structure-as-an-adjunct-grafting-modality/.
• 3.Ganz SD, Tawil I. Full-arch implant surgical and restorative considerations: innovative digital workflow using a verification jig with teeth. Dent Today. 2020 Jan [cited 2024 Mar 13];39(1):70–6. Available from: https://www.dentistrytoday.com/full-arch-implant-surgical-and-restorative-considerations-innovative-digital-workflow-using-a-verification-jig-with-teeth/.
• 4.Ganz SD, Tawil I. Continued innovation for full-arch immediate loading: small access hole technology. Dent Today. 2021 May 1 [cited 2024 Mar 13]. Available from: https://www.dentistrytoday.com/continued-innovation-for-full-arch-immediate-loading-small-access-hole-technology/.
• 5.Kim JE, Amelya A, Shin Y, Shim JS. Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jun;117(6):755–61. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.016.
• 6.Papaspyridakos P, Chen YW, Gonzalez-Gusmao I, Att W. Complete digital workflow in prosthesis prototype fabrication for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: a technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Sep;122(3):189–92. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.02.004.
• 7.Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Agustín-Panadero R, Bagán L, Giménez B, Peñarrocha M. Impression of multiple implants using photogrammetry: description of technique and case presentation. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014 Jul 1;19(4):e366–71. doi: 10.4317/medoral.19365.
• 8.Sánchez-Monescillo A, Sánchez-Turrión A, Vellon-Domarco E, Salinas-Goodier C, Prados-Frutos JC. Photogrammetry impression technique: a case history report. Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Jan–Feb;29(1):71–3. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4287.
• 9.Azevedo L, Molinero-Mourelle P, Antonaya-Martín JL, del Río-Highsmith J, Correia A, Gómez-Polo M. Photogrammetry technique for the 3D digital impression of multiple dental implants. In: Tavares JM, Natal Jorge R, editors. VipIMAGE 2019: proceedings of the VII ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Vision and Medical Image Processing; October 16–18, 2019, Porto, Portugal. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 615–9. (Lecture notes in computational vision and biomechanics).
• 10.Smile Syllabus Training Institute. XCell dental implant process parts. Hawthorne, NJ: Smile Syllabus Training Institute; c2019 [cited 2024 Mar 13]. Available from: https://smilesyllabus.com/ xcell-dental-implant-process-parts/.
• 11.Wilson TG Jr. The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study. J Periodontol. 2009 Sep;80(9):1388–92. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090115.
• 12.Tawil I. Avoiding peri-implantitis: key factors for improved clinical outcomes. Toronto: Newcom Media. Oral Health. 2016 Dec 2 [cited 2024 Mar 13]. Available from: https://www.oralhealthgroup.com/features/avoiding-peri-implantitis-key-factors-improved-clinical-outcomes #:~:text=Understanding%20the%20minimum%20required%20distance,respected%20in%20planning%20and%20placement.
• 13.Delucchi F, De Giovanni E, Pesce P, Bagnasco F, Pera F, Baldi D, Menini M. Framework materials for full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations: a systematic review of clinical studies. Materials (Basel). 2021 Jun 12;14(12):3251. doi: 10.3390/ma14123251.
• 14.Larsson C, Vult Von Steyern P. Implant-supported full-arch zirconia-based mandibular fixed dental prostheses. Eight-year results from a clinical pilot study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 Sep;71(5):1118–22. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2012.749518.
• 15.Abdulmajeed AA, Lim KG, Närhi TO, Cooper LF. Complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Jun;115(6):672–7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.025.
• 16.Gonzalez J, Triplett RG. Complications and clinical considerations of the implant-retained zirconia complete-arch prosthesis with various opposing dentitions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jul–Aug;32(4):864–9. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5369.
• 17.Misch CE. Bone classification, training keys to implant success. Dent Today. 1989 May;8(4):39–44.
• 18.Rasaie V, Abduo J, Falahchai M. Clinical and laboratory outcomes of angled screw channel implant prostheses: a systematic review. Eur J Dent. 2022 Jul;16(3):488–99. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740298.