The concept of immediacy in implant dentistry—why picking the right partner matters

• 1.Chen ST, Wilson TG, Jr., Hämmerle CH. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: Review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:12–25.
• 2.Nicolau P, Guerra F, Reis R, Krafft T, Benz K, Jackowski J. 10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface. Quintessence Int. 2019 Jan 25;50(2):114–24.
• 3.Ganeles J, Zollner A, Jackowski J, ten Bruggenkate C, Beagle J, Guerra F. Immediate and early loading of Straumann implants with a chemically modified surface (SLActive) in the posterior mandible and maxilla: 1-year results from a prospective multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Nov;19(11):1119–28.
• 4.De Macedo D, Madeira H, Jarry C. Single molar replacement immediately loaded with final crown through Straumann BLX and chairside digital workflow—one tooth one time technique. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30:242.
• 5.Eckert SE, Hueler G, Sandler N, Elkattah R, McNeil DC. Immediately loaded fixed full-arch implant-retained prosthesis: Clinical analysis when using a moderate insertion torque. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 May/June;34(3):737–44.
• 6.Eskan MA, Uzel G, Yilmaz S. A fixed reconstruction of fully edentulous patients with immediate function using an apically tapered implant design: A retrospective clinical study. Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Nov 23;6(1):77.
• 7.Coskunses FM, Tak Ö. Clinical performance of narrow-diameter titanium-zirconium implants in immediately loaded fixed full-arch prostheses: A 2-year clinical study. Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Apr 16; 7(1):30.
• 8.Chmielewski K, Ryncarz W, Yüksel O, Goncalves P, Baek KW, Cok S, Dard M. Image analysis of immediate full-arch prosthetic rehabilitations guided by a digital workflow: Assessment of the discrepancy between planning and execution. Int J of Implant Dent. 2019 Jul 15;5(1):26.
• 9.Arcuri C, Barlattani A Jr, Mazzetti V, Carosi P, Ferrigno N, Ferrigno N. Immediate restoration of a single upper central integrating digital workflow and a novel dental implant: A case report. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2019 Nov–Dec;33(6 Suppl. 2):171–7.
• 10.Al-Nawas B, Domagala P, Fragola G, Freiberger P, Ortiz-Vigón A, Rousseau P, Tondela J. A prospective noninterventional study to evaluate survival and success of reduced diameter implants made from titanium-zirconium alloy. J Oral Implantol. 2015 Aug;41(4):e118–25.
• 11.Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M, Corsi E, Anello T. Titanium-zirconium alloy narrow-diameter implants ((Straumann Roxolid(®)) for the rehabilitation of horizontally deficient edentulous ridges: Prospective study on 18 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23(10):1136–41.
• 12.Corcuera-Flores JR, Pérez-Fierro M, Blanco-Carrión A, Torres-Lagares D, Castellanos-Cosano L, Machuca-Portillo G. Bone loss around narrow implants versus standard diameter implants: Retrospective 2-years case-control study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Jan;12(1):e79–e84.
• 13.Lang NP, Salvi GE, Huynh-Ba G, Ivanovski S, Donos N, Bosshardt DD. Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Apr;22(4):349–56.14. Rupp F, Scheideler L, Olshanska N, de Wild M, Wieland M, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2006 Feb;76(2):323–34.
• 14.Rupp F, Scheideler L, Olshanska N, de Wild M, Wieland M, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2006 Feb;76(2):323–34.
• 15.De Wild M. Superhydrophilic SLActive implants. Straumann document 151.52, 2005.
• 16.Katharina Maniura. Laboratory for Materials—Biology Interactions Empa, St. Gallen, Switzerland. Protein and blood adsorption on Ti and TiZr implants as a model for osseointegration. EAO 22nd Annual Scientific Meeting, Oct 17–19 2013, Dublin.
• 17.Kopf BS, Schipanski A, Rottmar M, Berner S, Maniura-Weber K, Enhanced differentiation of human osteoblasts on Ti surfaces pre-treated with human whole blood. Acta Biomater. 2015 Jun;19:180–90.
• 18.Kopf BS, Ruch S, Berner S, Spencer ND, Maniura-Weber K, The role of nanostructures and hydrophilicity in osseointegration: In-vitro protein-adsorption and blood-interaction studies. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015 Aug; 103(8):2661–72.
• 19.Schwarz, F, Sager M, Ferrari D, Herten M, Wieland M, Becker J. Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at non-submerged and submerged chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: An immunohistochemical study in dogs. J Clin. Periodontol. 2008 Jan;35(1):64–75.
• 20.Rausch-fan X, Qu Z, Wieland M, Matejka M, Schedle A. Differentiation and cytokine synthesis of human alveolar osteoblasts compared to osteoblast-like cells (MG63) in response to titanium surfaces. Dent Mater. 2008 Jan;24(1):102–10.
• 21.Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early osseous integration at chemically modified and conventional SLA titanium implants: Preliminary results of a pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Aug;18(4):481–8.
• 22.Raghavendra S, Wood MC, Taylor TD. Early wound healing around endosseous implants: a review of the literature. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2005 May–Jun;20(3):425–31.
• 23.Oates TW, Valderrama P, Bischof M, Nedir R, Jones A, Simpson J, Toutenburg H, Cochran DL. Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2007 Sep–Oct;22(5):755–60.
• 24.Nicolau P, Guerra F, Reis R, Krafft T, Benz K, Jackowski J. 10-year results from a randomized controlled multicenter study with immediately and early loaded SLActive implants in posterior jaws. Presented at 25th Annual Scientific Meeting of the European Association of Osseointegration. 29 Sep–1 Oct 2016, Paris.
• 25.Nelson, K, Stricker, A, Raguse, JD and Nahles, S. Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: A clinical clarification. J Oral Rehabil, 2016 Nov;43(11):871–2.
• 26.Heberer S, Kilic S, Hossamo J, Raguse JD, Nelson K. Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted acid-etched implants: Preliminary results of a split-mouth study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2011 May;22(5):546–51.