3D-printed provisional restorations for complex prosthetic rehabilitation by Drs Stefanie Lindner & Andreas Keßler

• 1.Carvalho TS, Colon P, Ganss C, Huysmans MC, Lussi A, Schlueter N, Schmalz G, Shellis PR, Björg Tveit A, Wiegand A. Consensus report of the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry: erosive tooth wear diagnosis and management. Swiss Dent J. 2016;126(4):342–6. doi: 10.61872/sdj-2016-04-143.
• 2.Steiger-Ronay V, Kuster IM, Wiedemeier DB, Attin T, Wegehaupt FJ. Erosive loss of tooth substance is dependent on enamel surface structure and presence of pellicle—an in vitro study. Arch Oral Biol. 2020 Apr;112:104686. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2020.104686.
• 3.Barbour ME, Lussi A. Erosion in relation to nutrition and the environment. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:143–54. doi: 10.1159/000359941.
• 4.Kanzow P, Biermann J, Wiegand A. Questionnaire survey on the management of erosive tooth wear. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2019;17(3):227–34. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a41811.
• 5.Mesko ME, Sarkis-Onofre R, Cenci MS, Opdam NJ, Loomans B, Pereira-Cenci T. Rehabilitation of severely worn teeth: a systematic review. J Dent. 2016 May;48:9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.03.003.
• 6.Stansbury JW, Idacavage MJ. 3D printing with polymers: challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater. 2016 Jan;32(1):54–64. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.018.
• 7.Park SM, Park JM, Kim SK, Heo SJ, Koak JY. Flexural strength of 3D-printing resin materials for provisional fixed dental prostheses. Materials (Basel). 2020 Sep 8;13(18):3970. doi: 10.3390/ma13183970.
• 8.Kessler A, Hickel R, Reymus M. 3D printing in dentistry-state of the art. Oper Dent. 2020 Jan–Feb;45(1):30–40. doi: 10.2341/18-229-l.
• 9.Frasheri I, Aumer K, Keßler A, Miosge N, Folwaczny M. Effects of resin materials dedicated for additive manufacturing of temporary dental restorations on human gingival keratinocytes. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Oct;34(7):1105–112. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12938.
• 10.Reymus M, Lümkemann N, Stawarczyk B. 3D-printed material for temporary restorations: impact of print layer thickness and post-curing method on degree of conversion. Int J Comput Dent. 2019;22(3):231–7.
• 11.Keßler A, Hickel R, Ilie N. In vitro investigation of the influence of printing direction on the flexural strength, flexural modulus and fractographic analysis of 3D-printed temporary materials. Dent Mater J. 2021 May 29;40(3):641–9. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2020-147.
• 12.Kessler A, Reymus M, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Three-body wear of 3D printed temporary materials. Dent Mater. 2019 Dec;35(12):1805–12. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.10.005.
• 13.Unkovskiy A, Bui PH, Schille C, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Huettig F, Spintzyk S. Objects build orientation, positioning, and curing influence dimensional accuracy and flexural properties of stereolithographically printed resin. Dent Mater. 2018 Dec;34(12):e324–33. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.09.011.
• 14.Manapat JZ, Mangadlao JD, Tiu BD, Tritchler GC, Advincula RC. High-strength stereolithographic 3D printed nanocomposites: graphene oxide metastability. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017 Mar 22;9(11):10085–93. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b16174.