Broken file management with Er:YAG laser and SWEEPS technology—a case series by Dr Bartłomiej Karaś

• 1.Solomonov M, Webber M, Keinan D. Fractured endodontic instrument: a clinical dilemma. Retrieve, bypass or entomb? N Y State Dent J. 2014 Aug–Sep;80(5):50–2.
• 2.Su Z, Li Z, Shen Y, Bai Y, Zheng Y, Pan C, Hou B. Characteristics of the irrigant flow in a simulated lateral canal under two typical laser-activated irrigation regimens. Lasers Surg Med. 2021 Apr;53(4):587–94. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23317.
• 3.Jezeršek M, Lukač N, Lukač M. Measurement of simulated debris removal rates in an artificial root canal to optimize laser-activated irrigation parameters. Lasers Surg Med. 2021 Mar;53(3):411–7. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23297.
• 4.De Moor RJ, Meire M, Goharkhay K, Moritz A, Vanobbergen J. Efficacy of ultrasonic versus laser-activated irrigation to remove artificially placed dentin debris plugs. J Endod. 2010 Sep;36(9):1580–3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.007.
• 5.Karaś B. Less-Prep Endo—is a paradigm shift in root canal preparation ahead of us? Roots. 2022;18(2):18–27.