3D-printed hybrid composite restoration in a fully digital workflow by Dr Francesco Mangano

• 1.Nunes Sampaio G, de Oliveira Limírio JP, de Luna Gomes JM, Araújo Lemos CA, Alves Pesqueira A, Piza Pellizzer E. Evaluation of mechanical properties of CAD-CAM composite resins for milled versus 3D printed definitive restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Jun 11:S0022-3913(25)00457-3. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.05.024. Epub ahead of print.
• 2.Mandurino M, Cortili S, Coccoluto L, Greco K, Cantatore G, Gherlone EF, Vichi A, Paolone G. Mechanical properties of 3D printed vs. subtractively manufactured composite resins for permanent restorations: a systematic review. Materials (Basel). 2025 Feb 24;18(5):985. doi: 10.3390/ma18050985.
• 3.Moreira A, Gomes PS, Clemente MP, Mendes J. Comparative evaluation of 3D-printed resins for single-tooth dental crowns—provisional and permanent: a scoping review. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2025 Aug 29;33(2):296–17. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2876Moreira22.
• 4.Duarte S Jr, Phark JH. Advances in dental restorations: a comprehensive review of machinable and 3D-printed ceramic-reinforced composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Jan;37(1):257–76. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13371.
• 5.Korkmaz YN, Buyuk SK, Simsek H, Abay F. Comparison of the flexural strength of three different aged and nonaged 3D-printed permanent crown resins. Int J Prosthodont. 2024 Feb 21;37(7):203–7. doi: 10.11607/ijp.8987.
• 6.Demirsoy KK, Buyuk SK, Akarsu S, Kaplan MH, Simsek H, Abay F. Color alterations, flexural strength, and microhardness of 3D-printed resins treated in different coloring agents. Int J Prosthodont. 2025 Jan 31;38(1):111–8. doi: 10.11607/ijp.9043.
• 7.Gad MM, Al Mahfoudh HA, Al Mahfuth FA, Hashim KA, Khan SQ, Al-Qarni FD, Baba NZ, Al-Harbi FA. A comparative study of strength and surface properties of permanent 3D-printed resins with CAD-CAM milled fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthodont. 2024 Nov 20. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13990. Epub ahead of print.
• 8.Mudhaffer S, Haider J, Satterthwaite J, Silikas N. Effects of print orientation and artificial aging on the flexural strength and flexural modulus of 3D printed restorative resin materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2025 May;133(5):1345–57. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.008.
• 9.Mudhaffer S, Haider J, Silikas N, Satterthwaite J. Edge strength of definitive 3D-printed restorative resin materials. Dent Mater. 2025 Jun;41(6):745–54. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2025.04.005.
• 10.Mangano FG, Cianci D, Pranno N, Lerner H, Zarone F, Admakin O. Trueness, precision, time-efficiency and cost analysis of chairside additive and subtractive versus lab-based workflows for manufacturing single crowns: an in vitro study. J Dent. 2024 Feb;141:104792. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104792.
• 11.Hobbi P, Ordueri TM, Öztürk-Bozkurt F, Toz-Akalın T, Ateş MM, Özcan M. Assessing the performance of 3D-printed resin composite posterior fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year prospective clinical trial. J Dent. 2025 Sep;160:105887. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105887.
• 12.Mangano FG, Yang KR, Lerner H, Porrà T, Khachatryan LG, Gordienko ID, Admakin O. 3D-printed short-span hybrid composite implant-supported restorations fabricated through tilting stereolithography: a retrospective clinical study on 85 patients with 1 year of follow-up. J Dent. 2024 Aug;147:105095. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105095.
• 13.Mangano FG, Mangano C, Loktionova M, Dudnik O, Malanova O, Elovskaya A, Maltseva A, Dybov A. Additively manufactured hybrid composite implant-supported restorations: a retrospective clinical study of 145 patients with up to 2 years of follow-up. J Dent. 2025 Oct;161:105999. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105999.
• 14.Baresel I, Baresel J. Full arch accuracy of intraoral scanners with different acquisition technologies: an in vitro study. J Dent. 2025 May;156:105703. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105703.