Addressing smile aesthetics with digital orthodontic planning and treatment: A case report

• 1.Isiksal E, Hazar S, Akyalçin S. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jan;129(1):8–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.004.
• 2.Zachrisson BU. Esthetic factors involved in anterior tooth display and the smile: vertical dimension. J Clin Orthod. 1998 Jul;32(7):432–5.
• 3.Philips E. The classification of smile patterns. J Can Dent Assoc. 1999 May;65(5):252–4. Erratum in: J Can Dent Assoc 1999 Jun;65(6):324.
• 4.Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Stevenson MR. The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings. Eur J Orthod. 1999 Oct;21(5):517–22. doi:10.1093/ejo/21.5.517.
• 5.Benson KJ, Laskin DM. Upper lip asymmetry in adults during smiling. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Apr;59(4):396–8. doi: 10.1053/joms.2001.21874.
• 6.Sarver DM. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dento-facial Orthop. 2001 Aug;120(2):98–111. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.114301.
• 7.Thomas JL, Hayes C, Zawaideh S. The effect of axial midline angulation on dental esthetics. Angle Orthod. 2003 Aug;73(4):359–64. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)0732.0.CO;2.
• 8.Morley J, Eubank J. Macroesthetic elements of smile design. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001 Jan;132(1):39–45. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0023.
• 9.Ward DH. Proportional smile design using the recurring esthetic dental (red) proportion. Dent Clin North Am. 2001 Jan;45(1):143–54.
• 10.Ackerman JL, Ackerman MB, Brensinger CM, Landis JR. A morphometric analysis of the posed smile. Clin Orthod Res. 1998 Aug;1(1):2–11. doi: 10.1111/ocr.1998.1.1.2
• 11.Sarver DM, Ackerman MB. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: part 1. Evolution of the concept and dynamic records for smile capture. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Jul;124(1):4–12. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00306-8.
• 12.Sarver DM, Ackerman MB. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: part 2. Smile analysis and treatment strategies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Aug;124(2):116–27. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00307-x.
• 13.Frush JP, Fisher RD. The dynesthetic interpretation of the dentogenic concept. J Prosthet Dent. 1958 Jul;8(4):558–81. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(58)90043-x.
• 14.Du SQ, Rinchuse DJ, Zullo TG, Rinchuse DJ. Reliability of three methods of occlusion classification. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Apr;113(4):463–70.doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)80019-x.
• 15.Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod. 1972 Sep;62(3):296–309. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9416(72)90268-0.
• 16.Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Stevenson MR. The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings. Eur J Orthod. 1999 Oct;21(5):517–22. doi: 10.1093/ejo/21.5.517.
• 17.Rosenstiel SF, Rashid RG. Public preferences for anterior tooth variations: a web-based study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2002;14(2):97–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2002.tb00158.x.
• 18.Moore T, Southard KA, Casko JS, Qian F, Southard TE. Buccal corridors and smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Feb;127(2):208–13; quiz 261. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.11.027.
• 19.Parekh SM, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and laymen. Angle Orthod. 2006 Jul;76(4):557–63. doi:10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0557:AOVITS]2.0.CO;2.
• 20.Sarver DM, Ackerman JL. Orthodontics about face: the re-emergence of the esthetic paradigm. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 May;117(5):575–6. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70204-6.
• 21.Parrini S, Rossini G, Castroflorio T, Fortini A, Deregibus A, Debernardi C. Laypeopleʼs perceptions of frontal smile esthetics: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Nov;150(5):740–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.022.
• 22.Correa BD, Vieira Bittencourt MA, Machado AW. Influence of maxillary canine gingival margin asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jan;145(1):55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.09.010.
• 23.Kokich VO Jr, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11(6):311–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00414.x.
• 24.Kokich VO, Kokich VG, Kiyak HA. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Aug;130(2):141–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.017
• 25.Pinho S, Ciriaco C, Faber J, Lenza MA. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Dec;132(6):748–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.039.
• 26.Machado AW, Moon W, Gandini LG Jr. Influence of maxillary incisor edge asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 May;143(5):658–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.013.
• 27.Cunha TM, Barbosa ID, Palma KK. Orthodontic digital workflow: devices and clinical applications. Dental Press J Orthod. 2021 Dec 15;26(6):e21spe6. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.26.6.e21spe6.
• 28.Barreto MS, Faber J, Vogel CJ, Araujo TM. Reliability of digital orthodontic setups. Angle Orthod. 2016 Mar;86(2):255–9. doi: 10.2319/120914-890.1. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
• 29.Lecocq G, Truong Tan Trung L. Smile esthetics: calculated beauty? Int Orthod. 2014 Jun;12(2):149–70. English, French. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2014.03.015. Epub 2014 May 14.
• 30.Rotundo R, Nieri M, Lamberti E, Covani U, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Factors influencing the aesthetics of smile: an observational study on clinical assessment and patient’s perception. J Clin Periodontol. 2021 Nov;48(11):1449–57. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13531. Epub 2021 Aug 22.