Search Dental Tribune

Comprehensive dental rehabilitation with a digital workflow: A case study by Dr Michael Braian

  • 1.Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J. 2008 May 10;204(9):505–11. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350.
  • 2.Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, Logozzo S. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x.
  • 3.Kernen FR, Recca M, Vach K, Nahles S, Nelson K, Flügge TV. In vitro scanning accuracy using different aids for multiple implants in the edentulous arch. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Oct;33(10):1010–20. doi: 10.1111/clr.13982.
  • 4.Joda T, Brägger U. Time-efficiency analysis comparing digital and conventional workflows for implant crowns: a prospective clinical crossover trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Sep-Oct;30(5):1047–53. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3963.
  • 5.Bover-Ramos F, Viña-Almunia J, Cervera-Ballester J, Peñarrocha-Diago M, García-Mira B. Accuracy of implant placement with computer-guided surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing cadaver, clinical, and in vitro studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jan–Feb;33(1):101–15. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5556.
  • 6.Pal US, Dhiman NK, Singh G, Singh RK, Mohammad S, Malkunje LR. Evaluation of implants placed immediately or delayed into extraction sites. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jan;2(1):54–62. doi: 10.4103/0975-5950.85855.
  • 7.Heydecke G, Zwahlen M, Nicol A, Nisand D, Payer M, Renouard F, Grohmann P, Mühlemann S, Joda T. What is the optimal number of implants for fixed reconstructions: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:217–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02548.x.
  • 8.Braian M, Wennerberg A. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete-arch mandibular casts: a comparative in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Aug;122(2):129–36.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.007.
  • 9.Onbasi Y, Abu-Hossin S, Paulig M, Berger L, Wichmann M, Matta RE. Trueness of full-arch dental models obtained by digital and conventional impression techniques: an in vivo study. Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 29;12(1):22509. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26983-5.
  • 10.Kim JE, Amelya A, Shin Y, Shim JS. Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jun;117(6):755–61. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.016.
  • 11.Solá-Ruiz MF, Baixauli-López M, Roig-Vanaclocha A, Amengual-Lorenzo J, Agustín-Panadero R. Prospective study of monolithic zirconia crowns: clinical behavior and survival rate at a 5-year follow-up. J Prosthodont Res. 2021 Aug 21;65(3):284–90. doi: 10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_20_00034.
  • 12.Heller H, Sreter D, Arieli A, Beitlitum I, Pilo R, Levartovsky S. Survival and success rates of monolithic zirconia restorations supported by teeth and implants in bruxer versus non-bruxer patients: a retrospective study. Materials (Basel). 2022 Jan 22;15(3):833. doi: 10.3390/ma15030833.
advertisement
advertisement