Immediate full-arch zirconia implant therapy utilising the power of robotic assistance and digital scanning by Dr Daniel Madden

• 1.Albanchez-González MI, Brinkmann JC, Peláez-Rico J, López-Suárez C, Rodríguez-Alonso V, Suárez-García MJ. Accuracy of digital dental implants impression taking with intraoral scanners compared with conventional impression techniques: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 11;19(4):2026. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042026.
• 2.Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, Viguie G, Viennot S, Robinson P, Farges JC, Fages M, Ducret M. Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression. J Healthc Eng. 2017;2017:8427595. doi: 10.1155/2017/8427595.
• 3.Sun TM, Lee HE, Lan TH. Comparing accuracy of implant installation with a navigation system (NS), a laboratory guide (LG), NS with LG, and freehand drilling. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 22;17(6):2107. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062107.
• 4.Siqueira R, Chen Z, Galli M, Saleh I, Wang HL, Chan HL. Does a fully digital workflow improve the accuracy of computer-assisted implant surgery in partially edentulous patients? A systematic review of clinical trials. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Dec;22(6):660–71. doi: 10.1111/cid.12937.
• 5.Ban S. Classification and properties of dental zirconia as implant fixtures and superstructures. Materials (Basel). 2021 Aug 27;14(17):4879. doi: 10.3390/ma14174879.
• 6.Hanawa T. Zirconia versus titanium in dentistry: a review. Dent Mater J. 2020 Jan 31;39(1):24–36. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-172.
• 7.Hashim D, Cionca N, Courvoisier DS, Mombelli A. A systematic review of the clinical survival of zirconia implants. Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Sep;20(7):1403–17. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1853-9.
• 8.Oh HS, Lim YJ, Kim B, Kim MJ, Kwon HB, Baek YW. Effect of scanning-aid agents on the scanning accuracy in specially designed metallic models: a laboratory study. PLoS One. 2022 May 5;17(5):e0267742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267742.