The transparent gingiva project by Drs Ariel Savion, Serge Szmukler-Moncler & Roni Kolerman

• 1.Song YW, Bienz SP, Benic GI, Cha JK, Hämmerle CH, Jung UW, Jung RE. Soft-tissue dimensional change following guided bone regeneration on peri-implant defects using soft-type block or particulate bone substitutes: 1-year outcomes of a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2023 Feb;50(2):147–57. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13738.
• 2.Munakata M, Nagata K, Sanda M, Kawamata R, Sato D, Yamaguchi K. Variations in vertical mucosal thickness at edentulous ridge according to site and gender measured by cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Implant Dent. 2021 May 12;7(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00319-w.
• 3.Cui X, Reason T, Pardi V, Wu Q, Martinez Luna AA. CBCT analysis of crestal soft tissue thickness before implant placement and its relationship with cortical bone thickness. BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 10;22(1):593. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02629-w.
• 4.Lertwongpaisan T, Amornsettachai P, Panyayong W, Suphangul S. Soft tissue dimensional change using customized titanium healing abutment in immediate implant placement in posterior teeth. BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jun 12;23(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03060-5.
• 5.Noelken R, Geier J, Kunkel M, Jepsen S, Wagner W. Influence of soft tissue grafting, orofacial implant position, and angulation on facial hard and soft tissue thickness at immediately inserted and provisionalized implants in the anterior maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Oct;20(5):674–682. doi: 10.1111/cid.12643.
• 6.Lilet R, Desiron M, Finelle G, Lecloux G, Seidel L, Lambert F. Immediate implant placement combining socket seal abutment and peri-implant socket filling: a prospective case series. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Jan;33(1):33–44. doi: 10.1111/clr.13852.
• 7.Finelle G, Popelut A, Knafo B, Martín IS. Sealing socket abutments (SSAs) in molar immediate implants with a digitalized CAD/CAM protocol: soft tissue contour changes and radiographic outcomes after 2 years. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2021 Mar–Apr;41(2):235–44. doi: 10.11607/prd.4579.
• 8.Jung RE, Becker K, Bienz SP, Dahlin C, Donos N, Hammächer C, Iglhaut G, Liñares A, Ortiz-Vigón A, Sanchez N, Sanz-Sánchez I, Thoma DS, Valles C, Weng D, Nart J. Effect of peri-implant mucosal thickness on esthetic outcomes and the efficacy of soft tissue augmentation procedures: consensus report of group 2 of the SEPA/DGI/OF workshop. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Jun;33 Suppl 23(Suppl 23):100–8. doi: 10.1111/clr.13955.
• 9.Avila-Ortiz G, Couso-Queiruga E, Pirc M, Chambrone L, Thoma DS. Outcome measures and methods of assessment of soft-tissue augmentation interventions in the context of dental implant therapy: a systematic review of clinical studies published in the last 10 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 May;34 Suppl 25:84–96. doi: 10.1111/clr.13927.
• 10.Lilet R, Desiron M, Finelle G, Lecloux G, Seidel L, Lambert F. Immediate implant placement combining socket seal abutment and peri-implant socket filling: a prospective case series. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Jan;33(1):33–44. doi: 10.1111/clr.13852.
• 11.Zigdon H, Machtei EE. The dimensions of keratinized mucosa around implants affect clinical and immunological parameters. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Apr;19(4):387–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01492.x.
• 12.Borie M, Lecloux G, Bosshardt D, Barrantes A, Haugen HJ, Lambert F, Bacevic M. Peri-implant soft tissue integration in humans—influence of materials: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial and a pilot study results. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Aug 15;19:100643. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100643.
• 13.Canullo L, Giuliani A, Furlani M, Menini M, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. Influence of abutment macro- and micro-geometry on morphologic and morphometric features of peri-implant connective tissue. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Jun 21. doi: 10.1111/clr.14118. Epub ahead of print.
• 14.Gaggi G, Di Credico A, D’Addazio G, Ghinassi B, Argentieri G, Caputi S, Di Baldassarre A, Sinjari B. Impact on peri-implant connective tissue of laser treated versus traditional healing abutments: a human clinical trials. BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jun 27;23(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03148-y.
• 15.D’Avenia F, Del Fabbro M, Karanxha L, Weinstein T, Corbella S, Fumagalli D, Francetti L, Taschieri S. Hard and soft tissue changes in the rehabilitation of the anterior maxilla with triangular shape neck implants: a retrospective clinical study with a one-year follow up. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2019 Nov–Dec;33(6 Suppl 2):13–21.
• 16.Amer S, Szmukler-Moncler S, Sperber R , Savion A, Damaskos T, Beuer F. The transparent gingiva project. II. Effect of the shape of the healing abutment on the dimensions of the soft tissues. A pilot randomized clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. Forthcoming 2023.
• 17.Sperber R, Amer S, Szmukler-Moncler S, Savion A, Damaskos T, Beuer F. Stability of the marginal soft tissues after early and conventional healing periods. A pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res. Forthcoming 2023.
• 18.Szmukler-Moncler S, Savion A , Kolerman R. The transparent gingiva project. I. Using an enhanced digital superposition methodology to get access to the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the peri-implant gingiva. A technical note. Clin Oral Implants Res. Forthcoming 2023.
• 19.Pai UY, Rodrigues SJ, Talreja KS, Mundathaje M. Osseodensification—a novel approach in implant dentistry. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018 Jul–Sep;18(3):196–200. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_292_17.
• 20.Gutknecht N, Van Betteray C, Ozturan S, Vanweersch L, Franzen R. Laser supported reduction of specific microorganisms in the periodontal pocket with the aid of an Er,Cr:YSGG laser: a pilot study. ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:450258. doi: 10.1155/2015/450258.
• 21.Scharf DR, Tarnow DP. Modified roll technique for localized alveolar ridge augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992 Sep–Oct;12(5):415–25. doi: 10.11607/prd.00.0030.
• 22.Sullivan DY, Sherwood RL, Collins TA, Krogh PH. The reverse-torque test: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996 Mar–Apr;11(2):179–85.
• 23.Urbani G, Lombardo G, Szmukler-Moncler S. Early loading of FBR-coated Pitt-Easy implants. Application of a reverse torque of 30 Ncm to determine osseointegration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:xix.
• 24.Manfro R, Bortoluzzi MC, Fabris V, Elias CN, de Araújo VC. Clinical evaluation of anodized surface implants submitted to a counter torque of 25 Ncm after 60 days of osseointegration: study in humans. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015 Mar;14(1):1–6. doi: 10.1007/s12663-013-0582-8.
• 25.Salina S, Gualini F, Rigotti F, Mazzarini C, Longhin D, Grigoletto M, Buti J, Sbricoli L, Esposito M. Subcrestal placement of dental implants with an internal conical connection of 0.5 mm versus 1.5 mm: three-year after loading results of a multicentre within-person randomised controlled trial. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2019;12(2):155–67.
• 26.Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Steigmann M, Vindasiute E, Linkeviciene L. Influence of vertical soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants with platform switching: a comparative clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Dec;17(6):1228–36. doi: 10.1111/cid.12222.
• 27.Vervaeke S, Matthys C, Nassar R, Christiaens V, Cosyn J, De Bruyn H. Adapting the vertical position of implants with a conical connection in relation to soft tissue thickness prevents early implant surface exposure: a 2-year prospective intra-subject comparison. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 May;45(5):605–12. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12871.
• 28.Szmukler-Moncler S, Amer S, Sperber R , Savion A, Damaskos T, Beuer F. The transparent gingiva project. III. The alveolar crest is not the right place to measure the thickness of the gingiva in order to categorize its thickness. Clin Oral Implants Res. Forthcoming 2023.
• 29.Canullo L, Camacho-Alonso F, Tallarico M, Meloni SM, Xhanari E, Penarrocha-Oltra D. Mucosa thickness and peri-implant crestal bone stability: a clinical and histologic prospective cohort trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 May–Jun;32(5):675–681. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5349.