Search Dental Tribune

Further research is needed to understand the potential health and environmental risks of microplastic release from orthodontic aligners and to support evidence-based decisions in patient care. (Image: SIV Stock Studio/AdobeStock)

Plastics have become an integral part of modern society, revolutionising various industries and offering immense convenience in everyday life.1 However, the widespread use and disposal of plastics have led to significant environmental challenges, making it a pressing global issue.2 Plastics, especially microplastics, are omnipresent across terrestrial and marine environments, posing threats to wildlife, ecosystems and, potentially, human health.3,4 The persistence of plastics in the environment, coupled with their ability to act as vectors for pollutants, highlights the complexity and gravity of the issue.5,6 Research on plastic pollution is expanding, focusing on diversity, persistence, global effects, combined pollution and impacts on organisms. Efforts are being made to develop standardised methods to monitor and mitigate plastic pollution. 5 In addition, the use of plastics in orthodontics has raised concerns about the possible impact on human health. As the world grapples with the challenges of plastic pollution, there is a growing need for collaborative research, policy interventions and public awareness to address this urgent environmental concern.

In general, all plastics are made of polymers. Polymers can be broadly divided into natural polymers and synthetic polymers.7,8 Natural polymers are derived from plant or animal sources, such as cellulose, starch, proteins and DNA. Synthetic polymers are man-made polymers produced through chemical reactions and include commonly used materials such as polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polystyrene. Polymers can be further classified into the following:

  • Biodegradable polymers: These polymers, which may be either synthetic or natural, have the ability to break down into natural compounds under certain conditions, making them more environmentally friendly compared with traditional plastics.
  • Conductive polymers: These synthetic polymers have electrical conductivity properties, making them useful in electronics.
  • Thermosetting polymers: These synthetic polymers undergo a chemical reaction during polymerisation to form strong cross-linked structures, and this gives them excellent heat and chemical resistance.
  • Thermoplastic polymers: These synthetic polymers can be repeatedly softened and reshaped when heated, allowing for recycling and reuse.

Orthodontic aligners

As a relatively new invisible treatment modality, aligners offer some advantages over traditional fixed appliances. Nevertheless, compared with biocompatible materials such as stainless steel or ceramic, aligners possess some disadvantages. The plastic used is an environmental pollutant and has direct adverse effects on living beings. In the light of the combination of concerns regarding plastic and leaching of the endocrine-disrupting chemical bisphenol A, there should be second thoughts on the use of aligners considering the direct effect of plastics in the mouth through ingestion and that better alternative treatment modalities exist. The argument that there is always a risk and benefit ratio is not valid for aligner use. It could be valid if no alternative treatment modalities existed (as is the case with radiographic imaging).

Fig. 1: Invisalign aligners immersed in deionised water under agitation for seven days, without using an attachment-bonded arch or simulating masticatory function, released particulate aggregates that were retained on 1 μm fibreglass filters. Scanning electron microscopy showed micron-scale debris adhering to the filter surface (1,300 ×; scale bar: 20 μm; image: Dr Nearchos Panayi et al.).

Fig. 1: Invisalign aligners immersed in deionised water under agitation for seven days, without using an attachment-bonded arch or simulating masticatory function, released particulate aggregates that were retained on 1 μm fibreglass filters. Scanning electron microscopy showed micron-scale debris adhering to the filter surface (1,300 ×; scale bar: 20 μm; image: Dr Nearchos Panayi et al.).

Aligner ageing

All materials in nature undergo ageing in a unique manner and at a unique rate, and aligner materials are no exception. Moreover, in the harsh environment of the oral cavity, where several factors coincide (such as pH and temperature fluctuations, saliva, enzymes and masticatory forces), ageing is aggravated. Intra-oral ageing of aligners is characterised by water absorption, which is followed by deposition of proteinaceous biofilm that is prone to calcification in areas of reduced salivary clearance, affecting the reactivity and mechanical properties of aligner materials (Figs. 1 & 2).9 Other aspects of ageing include an increase in roughness of the attachments and a decrease of aligner efficiency due to friction, attrition and wear.9 Masticatory forces and composite resin attachments complicate these ageing phenomena, resulting in a complex interfacial profile and ageing pattern of aligners. In light of these findings regarding plastics, an imperative need for alternative materials or appliances for orthodontic treatment arises that minimises the risks for human health.

Importance of understanding the health implications of aligner plastics

The problems associated with the use of aligners are, firstly, the accumulation of millions of non-biodegradable aligners which pass through the waste stream into the human body and, secondly and perhaps more seriously, the direct ingestion of microplastics by the use of aligners. The possible release of microplastics from aligners has started to raise significant concern regarding potential health implications, emphasising the critical importance of comprehending and addressing this issue in orthodontic care.

Studies indicate that these particles can lead to adverse health effects upon ingestion or inhalation, potentially causing systemic inflammation and posing health risks.10 It is essential for healthcare providers to understand the degradation mechanisms of aligner materials and the leaching properties of microplastics from aligners to better grasp the associated health implications and to implement strategies to mitigate patient exposure,11 thereby ensuring the safety and efficacy of orthodontic treatments involving aligners. By fostering awareness among both orthodontic professionals and patients about the health implications of microplastic release from aligner plastics, informed decisions can be made concerning treatment options. By acknowledging and tackling this issue collectively, the orthodontic community can pave the way for integrated approaches that safeguard patient health, advocate for environmental responsibility and uphold overall well-being standards.

Environmental consequences of aligners

Examination of the materials used in aligners reveals valuable insights into their environmental impact. Aligners are primarily constructed from thermoplastic polymers such as polyethylene terephthalate glycol and polyurethane. These materials are preferred for their physical properties and are predominantly de rived from petroleum-based sources, posing a significant threat to the environment owing to their non-biodegradable nature. Aligners have consequences that can impact both ecosystems and human health,12 including long-term pollution and environmental contamination.13 Improper disposal of aligners can result in these plastics entering water bodies, contributing to the pervasive issue of plastic pollution in oceans and waterways.14 The presence of harmful substances in plastics, coupled with their ability to break down into microplastics, raises concerns about the ingestion of these particles by marine organisms and the subsequent transfer of contaminants up the food chain.12 Microplastic particles generated during use or disposal are capable of accumulating in the human body.12

Fig. 2: The particulate debris released from Invisalign aligners shared the chemical signature of the aligner polymer: micro-attenuated total reflection spectra of the fibreglass filter after immersion and filtration of Invisalign aligners displayed characteristic peaks identical to those of the Invisalign reference material, confirming that the particles attached to the filter surface originated from the aligner. For comparison, spectra of the Invisalign reference, the clean fiberglass filter and the post-filtration particles are shown across the 2,000–650 cm–¹ wavenumber range (absorbance scale; image: Dr Nearchos Panayi et al.).

Fig. 2: The particulate debris released from Invisalign aligners shared the chemical signature of the aligner polymer: micro-attenuated total reflection spectra of the fibreglass filter after immersion and filtration of Invisalign aligners displayed characteristic peaks identical to those of the Invisalign reference material, confirming that the particles attached to the filter surface originated from the aligner. For comparison, spectra of the Invisalign reference, the clean fiberglass filter and the post-filtration particles are shown across the 2,000–650 cm–¹ wavenumber range (absorbance scale; image: Dr Nearchos Panayi et al.).

Human health implications associated with aligners stem from the potential exposure to toxins and pollutants leached from these materials.12 Studies indicate that chemicals found in plastics can lead to adverse effects on human health, including increased risk of infertility and other serious health conditions.15 Therefore, understanding the consequences of plastics and especially aligner plastics is crucial, not only for preserving ecosystems but also for safeguarding human health from the hazards associated with plastic pollution.

The disposal and recycling options for aligners are important considerations in addressing the environmental impact of orthodontic treatment.15 Currently, aligners are predominantly classified as medical waste, limiting traditional recycling avenues owing to hygiene and safety concerns.

Microplastic release from aligners

Microplastic release from aligners has emerged as a significant environmental and health concern, shedding light on the unintended consequences of orthodontic treatment. Aligners have been found to release microplastic particles during use owing to mechanical friction and wear, and this may have implications for human health and environmental pollution.16 The release of microplastics in this manner raises concerns about the potential ingestion of these microplastics and possible health risks. The analysis by Quinzi et al. revealed variations in the quantity of microplastics shed according to the polymeric composition of the aligner material, highlighting the need for closer scrutiny of aligner materials and manufacturing processes to minimise microplastic release.16 Moreover, the correlation between the size distribution of microplastics released from aligners and their potential impact on human health has been underscored in recent studies.16 Understanding the size range and abundance of released microplastics is crucial for assessing their environmental persistence, bioavailability and toxicological effects on ecosystems and human populations.

Although many of the concerns regarding plastic are known globally, companies supplying aligners generally do not give the proper attention to the direct impact of aligners on human health, focusing instead on the impact of plastics on the environment. For example, in a response14 to a letter,17 Align Technology explained ways to reduce the environmental burden of plastic. However, it did not address the direct impact of aligners in the mouth.14 Independent research by multiple centres should be undertaken to investigate this critical issue. The phenomenon of microplastic release from aligners underscores the importance of balancing orthodontic treatment efficiency with human health considerations as well as environmental ones.

Extent of microplastic contamination

Studies have demonstrated the extensive distribution of microplastics across various ecosystems, including marine, atmospheric and terrestrial environments, highlighting the multifaceted nature of microplastic contamination.18 In marine environments, high levels of microplastic contamination have been reported worldwide, and microplastics have been found in diverse marine habitats, such as coastal waters and deep sea sediments.18 In terrestrial environments, including soil and freshwater systems, studies have reported varying levels of microplastic contamination and a range of sources, among them direct inputs and secondary contamination through atmospheric deposition and surface run-off.18

Human health effects of ingested microplastics

Ingested microplastics have garnered attention for their potential impact on various aspects of human health, encompassing gastrointestinal health, respiratory function, cardiovascular health and neurological well-being. A growing body of research indicates that microplastic exposure may exert detrimental effects on different physiological systems, raising concerns about their broader health implications.19, 20

Studies have shown that chronic exposure to microplastics can induce dysbiosis, altering the composition and diversity of the gut microbiota.21, 22 Microplastics can trigger intestinal dysbiosis characterised by changes in the abundance of specific bacterial phyla, such as an enrichment of Bacillota (Firmicutes), Pseudomonadota (Proteobacteria) and Chlamydiota (Chlamydiae) and a reduction in Bacteroidota (Bacteroidetes).22 These disruptions in the gut microbiota composition can have far-reaching consequences on host health, potentially leading to the onset of chronic disease and promoting pathogenic infections.21 Moreover, the interaction between microplastics and the gut microbiota can compromise gut homeostasis.23 This disruption can increase intestinal permeability and stimulate inflammatory responses, leading to elevated levels of immune-related molecules associated with inflammation.22

For the respiratory system, inhalation of airborne microplastics has emerged as a critical concern, having implications for respiratory health, including potential lung toxicity.24 Deposition of microplastics in the lungs can trigger inflammatory responses, respiratory complications and respiratory-related diseases, underscoring the need to assess the respiratory effects of microplastic exposure comprehensively.

Moreover, an association between ingested microplastics and coronary heart disease has been highlighted in recent studies, suggesting a potential link between microplastics in arterial plaque and cardiovascular risk factors.25, 26 In one of these studies, patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery disease were assigned to two groups according to the presence of microplastics and nanoplastics in their plaque.26 The study found that many patients had detectable levels of polyethylene in their excised carotid plaque, along with measurable amounts of PVC. Patients with evidence of microplastics and nanoplastics in the carotid plaque had a significantly higher risk of experiencing a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke or death from any cause compared with those whose plaque showed no detectable microplastics and nanoplastics. This study provides compelling evidence of a potential association between the presence of microplastics and nanoplastics in plaque and an increased risk of cardiovascular events.

It must be added that this study included older patients with no direct exposure to plastics in aligners. It can be assumed that direct exposure to plastics in the harsh oral cavity for months or even years can have an even more catastrophic effect on health. In light of early orthodontic treatment using aligners, very early plastic accumulation in the body could result in disease, which could start earlier and be associated with more severe symptoms.26

Furthermore, the impact of microplastics on brain health and neurological function is an emerging area of investigation, and studies are exploring the potential neurotoxic effects of microplastic exposure.20 The ability of microplastics and nanoplastics to cross the blood–brain barrier and accumulate in neural tissue raises concerns about associated neuro-inflammation, neurodegenerative disease and cognitive impairment. Based on the issues raised regarding microplastics, it is obvious that direct exposure to plastics in the oral cavity may increase the possibility of adverse effects on human health.

Mechanisms of uptake into the body

The mechanisms underlying the uptake of microplastics and nanoplastics into the human body have attracted significant scientific interest owing to their potential health implications, and understanding these mechanisms is crucial for comprehending the pathways through which plastics enter and interact with human cells, tissue and organ systems.27, 28 Inhalation, ingestion and skin contact are the three primary routes through which microplastics and nanoplastics can enter the human body.28 Inhalation of airborne microplastics can lead to their deposition in the respiratory tract, where they may be engulfed by lung cells or translocate to other organs through systemic circulation. Similarly, ingestion of microplastics through contaminated food and water sources or aligner wear can result in their uptake by the gastrointestinal tract, allowing for systemic distribution throughout the body. Once inside the body, plastics can interact with a wide range of biomolecules, including proteins, lipids and nucleic acids—as well as biologically relevant ions—forming coronated nanoplastic particles that may facilitate their absorption and distribution.28 Cellular uptake of nanoplastics involves endocytosis mechanisms, including processes such as phagocytosis, pinocytosis and macropinocytosis.28 The characteristics of nanoplastics, such as size, surface charge and composition, play a crucial role in determining their cellular uptake efficiency and intracellular fate. Within cells, nanoplastics can induce apoptosis, cytotoxic effects and cellular damage, emphasising the importance of understanding how particle properties influence their biological effects.

Understanding the comprehensive health risks of plastics and microplastics

Further research on plastics, particularly aligner plastics, and a comprehensive understanding of the associated health risks are paramount in safeguarding human well-being and the environment. While existing studies have shed light on some aspects of plastic exposure, there remain significant gaps in knowledge that require urgent attention and investigation.11, 29 Specifically, the issue of aligner plastics has not been examined yet, although these create a high hazard to the human being, both in the exposure time and the direct contact with the beginning of the gastrointestinal tract. Research focusing on aligner plastics is essential to assess the specific contribution of these materials to overall plastic pollution and potential health risks.29 Understanding the composition of aligner materials, degradation behaviour of aligner materials and release of microplastics from aligners during use is critical for evaluating the impact of aligners on human health and the environment comprehensively. Comprehensive health risk assessments should consider the entire life cycle of aligners, from production to disposal, to identify potential points of exposure and associated hazards.30 Examining factors such as manufacturing processes, material properties and end-of-life scenarios can provide insights into the complete spectrum of health risks posed by aligner plastics.

Furthermore, the interdisciplinary nature of plastic health research necessitates collaboration between experts in materials science, toxicology, epidemiology and environmental health to address the multifaceted challenges posed by plastics.31 Integrated approaches that merge knowledge from various disciplines are crucial for developing holistic risk assessments and informing evidence-based policies. In addition to studying the physical and chemical properties of plastics, research must investigate the biological effects of plastic exposure on human health, including inflammation, oxidative stress and metabolic disorders.29, 32

The release of microplastics from aligners during wear raises questions about the safety and long-term implications of orthodontic treatments utilising such materials. To mitigate these risks, it is essential to conduct in-depth investigations into the leaching properties, environmental impact and health outcomes associated with microplastic exposure from orthodontic appliances, including aligners.33, 34

Ultimately, a multidisciplinary approach involving scientific research, regulatory oversight and patient education is crucial to address the complex health risks posed by ingested microplastics from aligners comprehensively. By advancing knowledge, promoting responsible practices and prioritising patient safety, the orthodontic community can work towards mitigating the potential health impacts associated with microplastic exposure through orthodontic treatments involving aligners. Overall, advancing research on plastics and their comprehensive health risks requires a concerted effort to fill knowledge gaps, prioritise data-driven decision-making and promote transparency in scientific investigations.35

Conclusion

A decisive call to action is imperative for orthodontic professionals and patients to address the issue of microplastic release from aligners and consider transitioning to alternative treatment modalities. The emerging evidence highlighting the potential detachment of microplastics from aligners underscores the urgency for proactive measures to mitigate human health risks and environmental concerns.

Editorial note:

The list of references can be found here. This article was published in aligners—international magazine of aligner orthodontics vol. 4, issue 2/2025.

Tags:
To post a reply please login or register
advertisement
advertisement