Search Dental Tribune

Eleven tips for success in your dental clinic Part II: CAPS & CLIMB

Photograph: (Geralt/PixaBay)

Tue. 14. February 2017

save

Today, I will share with you the knowledge I have gained within the past 25 years of managing and evolving my clinic so you can always be one step ahead and avoid mistakes I have made in the past. The third very important tip that I am going to share with you today in order to be and remain successful at your clinics is how to regain your power.

We learn a lot of things during our studies in the dental schools. We learn how to make the best fillings with great contours and biocompatible materials; how to treat a tooth that needs a root canal therapy, but do we really learn anything on how to find the best employee that will make our life and daily routine easier?

Firstly we should make a job analysis by listing the CAPS of the candidate. If we do not take the time to complete this process, we will not know from the beginning exactly what we are looking at and by this we will increase the risk of making the wrong choice.
If, for example, we go to the supermarket without our shopping list, what will we end up doing? We will most probably buy unnecessary things or even forget the things that we went in the beginning there for. My point here is that when we decide that we need to hire an employee we should know upfront what we are looking for, otherwise we might make mistakes that will cost us money and time!

Let’s have a look now what does CAPS stand for:
Capacities: The mental and physical abilities required to do the job. How smart and how strong (physically capable) must the successful applicant be?
Attitudes: such as customer service, orientation, team player, reliability, honesty, willingness to follow rules, problem-solving, loyalty, safety-consciousness, ability to follow through—Imagine having a receptionist who, although she is doing the job without a mistake, complains about everything all the time. Is that a person that you would love to have as part of your team?
Personality: traits such as competitiveness, assertiveness, attention to detail and sociability—Also search whether the person will manage his or her personality to get the job done, since as social scientists declare about 60 per cent of our personality traits are inherited and most of them are set by age nine. In other words: personality can’t be taught and it doesn’t change much over time.
Skills: Expertise required to do the job—Skills are the easiest job requirements to identify. We could do that by asking the candidate to perform certain tests. For example, if we are trying to find a receptionist we could ask her to translate an article, or through role playing to check how she responds in certain scenarios.

Have always in mind the quote ‘we hire them for the skills but we fire them for their attitudes’!

So finally we found our A-star employees and now what do we have to do in order to keep them?
The fourth very essential tip of today’s article that I would love to share with you is the different ways that we can use to retain our A-star employees.

Apply CLIMB to retain your team!

Now let’s explain a little what does exactly the acronym CLIMB stands for:
Challenge: Studies have shown that the main reason that our employees resign is that they are dissatisfied with their tasks. That’s why we should give them challenging duties to accomplish. And what will the result be? They will feel useful and they will find it difficult to leave from a job that offers them different and unique experiences.
Loyalty: Be human with your employees and do not be afraid that you will lose your power. Show interest in their problems and lay back in times that they cannot handle any more pressure.
Investment: Invest time and money to them so they will feel appreciated. During my lectures I get regularly the question that we reward them by giving them bonus and still they are not motivated enough, what shall we do? My answer here is that you must renew your reward system regularly.

Sometimes you can give them cash (as bonuses) or maybe you can offer them other kind of incentives, like buying them a free trip for vacation on Christmas, for example. Research has proven that the more powerful and effective incentives are the ones that are specific, tangible and non-cash.

Also please remember to ‘Reward not the best in sales but the best’ A major mistake that we usually do is to only reward the ones that bring money to our clinics. Instead we should reward the best in our practices, the ones that are completing their tasks in excellence unconditionally to what this task is.
Measurement: Conduct a fair performance appraisal every six months.
Building: Demonstrate your commitment to them by showing them opportunities of career development.

During the next issue we will analyse two new tips that will reveal new opportunities and potential of our dental clinics. Till then, remember that not only are you the dentist in your clinic, but you are also the manager and the leader.

You can always send me your questions and request for more information and guidance at:
dba@yiannikosdental.com or via our Facebook account.

Looking forward to our next trip of business growth and educational development!

To post a reply please login or register

AI chatbots align closely with implant prosthodontic evidence

A new study has explored how ChatGPT and Google Gemini compare with findings from systematic reviews when answering clinical questions in implant prosthodontics, finding strong overall agreement. (Image: WavebreakMediaMicro/Adobe Stock)

Tue. 30. June 2026

save

PIRACICABA, Brazil: In implant prosthodontics, the growing body of research that clinicians must navigate raises the possibility of using large language model-based artificial intelligence (AI) tools to help organise this information and support clinical reasoning, but their alignment with systematically appraised evidence remains unclear. A new study has examined this issue by comparing responses from ChatGPT and Google Gemini against conclusions from recent systematic reviews and found a high level of agreement, but also differences in the certainty levels reported for the platforms’ answers.

The researchers compared responses generated by ChatGPT and Google Gemini with the conclusions of 74 systematic reviews published between 2023 and 2025. The reviews covered five domains: prosthesis design, implant components, biological and mechanical complications, clinical protocols and prosthetic retention.

To create a benchmark, the authors formulated clinical questions from the objectives of the systematic reviews and used the conclusions of the reviews as expected answers. They then submitted the questions to both AI platforms using identical prompts. The responses were then independently evaluated against the review conclusions by two blinded assessors.

Across all five clinical domains, ChatGPT and Gemini generally generated answers that aligned closely with the conclusions of the systematic reviews, and there were no statistically significant differences in agreement between the platforms. Previous research has similarly reported that some AI chatbots can provide accurate and consistent responses to common prosthodontic questions, although performance varied depending on the platform and the complexity of the topic.

According to the researchers, the findings point to a potential role for AI tools to help practitioners navigate the expanding body of implant dentistry research more efficiently. However, important differences emerged in the certainty levels the platforms gave for their answers. ChatGPT most frequently described its answers with moderate confidence, whereas Gemini tended to express high confidence. While this did not affect agreement with the review conclusions, the authors cautioned that confidence levels should not be interpreted as a measure of evidence quality.

The study also highlighted broader concerns surrounding the use of AI in healthcare. Large language models can generate plausible but inaccurate responses, and users may place undue trust in highly confident answers. The authors concluded that AI chatbots show promise as support tools for evidence synthesis in implant prosthodontics but that their integration into evidence-based clinical workflows requires careful supervision and critical interpretation in clinical settings.

The article, titled “Alignment of artificial intelligence-generated responses with systematic reviews in implant prosthodontics”, was published online on 2 June 2026 in the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, ahead of inclusion in an issue.

Topics:
Tags:
To post a reply please login or register
advertisement
advertisement