Search Dental Tribune

Irrigating the root canal: A case report

Post-operative radiograph (Image: Dr Vittorio Franco, UK and Italy)
Dr Vittorio Franco, UK and Italy

Dr Vittorio Franco, UK and Italy

Mon. 22. January 2018

save

The patient reported on in this article is a student in dentistry and his parents are both dentists. They referred their son to a good endodontist, who then referred the case to me. As always, peers are more than welcome in either of my practices, in Rome and London, so when I treated this case, I had three dentists watching me, a future dentist on the chair, placing a great deal of pressure on me.

The 22-year-old male patient had a history of trauma to his maxillary incisors and arrived at my practice with symptoms related to tooth #21. The tooth, opened in an emergency by the patient’s mother, was tender when prodded, with a moderate level of sensitivity on the respective buccal gingiva. Sensitivity tests were negative for the other central incisor (tooth #12 was positive), and a periapical radiograph showed radiolucency in the periapical areas of both of the central incisors. The apices of these teeth were quite wide and the length of teeth appeared to exceed 25 mm.

My treatment plan was as follows: root canal therapy with two apical plugs with a calcium silicate-based bioactive cement. The patient provided his consent for the treatment of the affected tooth and asked to have the other treated in a subsequent visit.

After isolating with a rubber dam, I removed the temporary filling, and then the entire pulp chamber roof with a low-speed round drill. The working length was immediately evaluated using an electronic apex locator and a 31 mm K-type file. The working length was determined to be 28 mm.

As can be seen in the photographs, the canal was actually quite wide, so I decided to only use an irrigating solution and not a shaping instrument. Root canals are usually shaped so that there will be enough space for proper irrigation and a proper shape for obturation. This usually means giving these canals a tapered shape to ensure good control when obturating. With open apices, a conical shape is not needed, and often there is enough space for placing the irrigating solution deep and close to the apex.

I decided to use only some syringes containing 5 per cent sodium hypochlorite and EDDY, a sonic tip produced by VDW, for delivery of the cleaning solution and to promote turbulence in the endodontic space and shear stress on the canal walls in order to remove the necrotic tissue faster and more effectively. After a rinse with sodium hypochlorite, the sonic tip was moved to and from the working length of the canal for 30 seconds. This procedure was repeated until the sodium hypochlorite seemed to become ineffective, was clear and had no bubbles. I did not use EDTA, as no debris or smear layer was produced.

I suctioned the sodium hypochlorite, checked the working length with a paper point and then obturated the canal with a of 3 mm in thickness plug of bioactive cement. I then took a radiograph before obturating the rest of the canal with warm gutta-percha. I used a compomer as a temporary filling material.

The symptoms resolved, so I conducted the second treatment only after some months, when the tooth #11 became tender. Tooth #21 had healed. I performed the same procedure and obtained the same outcome (the four-month follow-up radiograph showed healing).

Editorial note: A complete list of references are available from the publisher. This article was published in roots - international magazine of endodontology No. 04/2017.

One thought on “Irrigating the root canal: A case report

  1. The ultimate reason why root canals fail is bacteria. If our mouths were sterile there would be no decay or infection, and damaged teeth could, in ways, repair themselves. So although we can attribute nearly all root canal failure to the presence of bacteria, I will discuss five common reasons why root canals fail, and why at least four of them are mostly preventable.

To post a reply please login or register

FDI report highlights a decade of patient-centred oral health data

A new report shows that combining patient-reported outcomes with clinical findings can generate more comprehensive evidence to support patient-centred oral healthcare, strengthen research and inform oral health policy. (Image: alfa27/Adobe Stock)

Fri. 21. August 2026

save

GENEVA, Switzerland: FDI World Dental Federation has published a new report reviewing ten years of data from its Oral Health Observatory (OHO). The data demonstrates how combining patient-reported outcomes with clinical findings can strengthen research and support more patient-centred oral healthcare. The report highlights the OHO’s growing role in generating practice-based evidence to inform oral health policy and advocacy efforts worldwide.

Established in 2014, the OHO has evolved from a pilot initiative into a multinational project spanning more than a dozen countries across all six World Health Organization regions. It has collected standardised data from more than 10,000 patients. By combining clinical assessments with patient-reported information on oral health behaviours, access to care and the effects of oral health on daily life, the project provides a more comprehensive understanding of oral health and its wider impact.

The OHO is intended to complement national oral health surveys. Traditional national oral health surveys are typically conducted every five to ten years and focus predominantly on clinical status. By contrast, OHO data can be collected more frequently, using a common methodology to collect practice-based information on disease burden, access to care, oral health behaviours and quality of life across participating countries. According to the report, this enables meaningful comparisons between countries and generates evidence that can be translated into local policy and advocacy.

Over the past decade, the initiative has generated nine peer-reviewed publications and supported national dental associations in developing evidence-based advocacy. The report gives examples that highlight the direct relevance of OHO findings to policy development and advocacy. In Lebanon, they informed the country’s first national oral health strategy. In India, the data supported national campaigns on sugar consumption and tobacco control. In Tanzania, the project has contributed to discussions on universal health insurance and national oral health planning.

The report emphasises the value of integrating patient-reported functional and psychosocial impacts with clinical data. According to the authors, showing how oral disease affects daily life and productivity can help policymakers better understand unmet need and help strengthen the case for preventive investment.

The emphasis on patient-centred evidence in the report reflects a wider movement in dental practice towards measuring patients’ experiences and outcomes alongside clinical findings. A recent study identified a core set of patient-reported outcome and experience measures that could help dental practices use patient feedback more consistently to support quality improvement and inform clinical decision-making.

Looking ahead, FDI said the next phase of the project will focus on expanding geographical coverage, improving representation of underserved populations and strengthening the translation of evidence into health policy. Together, these priorities are intended to strengthen the OHO’s role as a bridge between research, dental practice and public health decision-making by broadening the reach and policy relevance of its combined practice-based clinical information and patient-reported outcomes.

The report, titled Ten Years of Oral Health Observatory Data: Evidence, Impact and the Road Ahead, is available for download from the FDI website.

Topics:
Tags:
To post a reply please login or register
advertisement
advertisement