Search Dental Tribune

Irrigating the root canal: A case report

Post-operative radiograph (Image: Dr Vittorio Franco, UK and Italy)
Dr Vittorio Franco, UK and Italy

Dr Vittorio Franco, UK and Italy

Mon. 22. January 2018

save

The patient reported on in this article is a student in dentistry and his parents are both dentists. They referred their son to a good endodontist, who then referred the case to me. As always, peers are more than welcome in either of my practices, in Rome and London, so when I treated this case, I had three dentists watching me, a future dentist on the chair, placing a great deal of pressure on me.

The 22-year-old male patient had a history of trauma to his maxillary incisors and arrived at my practice with symptoms related to tooth #21. The tooth, opened in an emergency by the patient’s mother, was tender when prodded, with a moderate level of sensitivity on the respective buccal gingiva. Sensitivity tests were negative for the other central incisor (tooth #12 was positive), and a periapical radiograph showed radiolucency in the periapical areas of both of the central incisors. The apices of these teeth were quite wide and the length of teeth appeared to exceed 25 mm.

My treatment plan was as follows: root canal therapy with two apical plugs with a calcium silicate-based bioactive cement. The patient provided his consent for the treatment of the affected tooth and asked to have the other treated in a subsequent visit.

After isolating with a rubber dam, I removed the temporary filling, and then the entire pulp chamber roof with a low-speed round drill. The working length was immediately evaluated using an electronic apex locator and a 31 mm K-type file. The working length was determined to be 28 mm.

As can be seen in the photographs, the canal was actually quite wide, so I decided to only use an irrigating solution and not a shaping instrument. Root canals are usually shaped so that there will be enough space for proper irrigation and a proper shape for obturation. This usually means giving these canals a tapered shape to ensure good control when obturating. With open apices, a conical shape is not needed, and often there is enough space for placing the irrigating solution deep and close to the apex.

I decided to use only some syringes containing 5 per cent sodium hypochlorite and EDDY, a sonic tip produced by VDW, for delivery of the cleaning solution and to promote turbulence in the endodontic space and shear stress on the canal walls in order to remove the necrotic tissue faster and more effectively. After a rinse with sodium hypochlorite, the sonic tip was moved to and from the working length of the canal for 30 seconds. This procedure was repeated until the sodium hypochlorite seemed to become ineffective, was clear and had no bubbles. I did not use EDTA, as no debris or smear layer was produced.

I suctioned the sodium hypochlorite, checked the working length with a paper point and then obturated the canal with a of 3 mm in thickness plug of bioactive cement. I then took a radiograph before obturating the rest of the canal with warm gutta-percha. I used a compomer as a temporary filling material.

The symptoms resolved, so I conducted the second treatment only after some months, when the tooth #11 became tender. Tooth #21 had healed. I performed the same procedure and obtained the same outcome (the four-month follow-up radiograph showed healing).

Editorial note: A complete list of references are available from the publisher. This article was published in roots - international magazine of endodontology No. 04/2017.

One thought on “Irrigating the root canal: A case report

  1. The ultimate reason why root canals fail is bacteria. If our mouths were sterile there would be no decay or infection, and damaged teeth could, in ways, repair themselves. So although we can attribute nearly all root canal failure to the presence of bacteria, I will discuss five common reasons why root canals fail, and why at least four of them are mostly preventable.

To post a reply please login or register

Tarnow Chu Institute launches new online dental education campus

Drs Dennis P. Tarnow and Stephen J. Chu are both award-winning dental educators and the founders of Tarnow Chu Institute, which is now expanding its reach with the launch of the online Tarnow Chu Institute Campus. (Image: Tarnow Chu Institute)

Tue. 15. September 2026

save

Tarnow Chu Institute, led by Drs Dennis P. Tarnow and Stephen J. Chu, is launching an online platform for continuing dental education: the Tarnow Chu Institute Campus. This extension of the institute will offer free live and on-demand webinars. It will also provide exclusive access to online instructional videos on a broad range of topics, including implant therapy, treatment planning, smile design and aesthetics.

The Tarnow Chu Institute Campus is an evolving educational hub through which participants can learn directly from recognised clinicians. According to Drs Tarnow and Chu, its lecture programme will feature specialists in periodontics, prosthodontics and orthodontics with experience in optimal treatment planning. When asked about the motivation for launching the Tarnow Chu Institute Campus, Dr Tarnow told Dental Tribune International: “Our goal is to reach more dentists who are passionate about adding to their professional knowledge to improve their professional satisfaction and clinical outcomes.”

Regarding the practical skills and clinical knowledge that participants can expect to acquire, Dr Chu told Dental Tribune International: “Our major focus has always been the management of problem cases in the aesthetic zone, and we use an evidence-based, interdisciplinary treatment approach. Our courses combine surgical and restorative considerations and teach the easiest, fastest, least expensive and, most importantly, the best way to manage the problem areas that patients present with.”

Dr Tarnow is director of implant education at the Columbia University College of Dental Medicine in New York and clinical professor of dental medicine in the Division of Periodontics. He is the former Chairman of the Department of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry at New York University College of Dentistry. Dr Chu was a member of the teaching staff at the New York University College of Dentistry for 26 years, including as an adjunct clinical professor in periodontics, implant dentistry and prosthodontics, and formerly directed its continuing education programme in advanced aesthetic dentistry. Drs Tarnow and Chu both lecture extensively around the world and continue to produce clinical research in the areas of surgical, restorative, aesthetic and interdisciplinary dentistry. Drawing on their combined experience, Drs Tarnow and Chu provide advanced dental education in clinical techniques and treatment principles grounded in research.

The first live webinar on the Tarnow Chu Institute Campus will take place on 15 September. Participants will be able to earn continuing education credits through the campus’s webinars. More information about the Tarnow Chu Institute Campus and forthcoming webinars can be found at campus.tarnowchuinstitute.com.

Tags:
To post a reply please login or register
advertisement
advertisement