The best of both worlds: A hybrid digital–analogue workflow for a maxillary full-arch implant-supported prosthesis by Dr Marijana Eic et al.

• 1.Flügge T, Kramer J, Nelson K, Nahles S, Kernen F. Digital implantology—a review of virtual planning software for guided implant surgery. Part II: prosthetic set-up and virtual implant planning. BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jan 30;22(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02057-w.
• 2.Spear F. The maxillary central incisal edge: a key to esthetic and functional treatment planning. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1999 Jun;20(6):512–6.
• 3.Ganz SD, Tawil I. Full-arch implant surgical and restorative considerations: utilizing a full template guidance technique. Dent Today. 2019 Sep;38(9):72–8.
• 4.Katsoulis J, Takeichi T, Sol Gaviria A, Peter L, Katsoulis K. Misfit of implant prostheses and its impact on clinical outcomes. Definition, assessment and a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10 Suppl 1:121–38.
• 5.Cheng J, Zhang H, Liu H, Li J, Wang HL, Tao X. Accuracy of edentulous full-arch implant impression: an in vitro comparison between conventional impression, intraoral scan with and without splinting, and photogrammetry. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024 May;35(5):560–72. doi: 10.1111/clr.14252.
• 6.Revilla-León M, Att W, Özcan M, Rubenstein J. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Mar;125(3):470–8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.005.
• 7.Gaikwad AM, Joshi AA, de Oliveira-Neto OB, Padhye AM, Nadgere JB, Ram SM, Yadav SR. An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating different impression techniques for implant-supported prostheses in partially and completely edentulous arches. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 Nov–Dec;37(6):1119–37. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9635.
• 8.Palantza E, Sykaras N, Zoidis P, Kourtis S. In vitro comparison of accuracy between conventional and digital impression using elastomeric materials and two intra-oral scanning devices. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024 Aug;36(8):1179–198. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13227.
• 9.Ma J, Zhang B, Song H, Wu D, Song T. Accuracy of digital implant impressions obtained using intraoral scanners: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo studies. Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Dec 6;9(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00517-8.
• 10.Mehta SP, Sutariya PV, Pathan MR, Upadhyay HH, Patel SR, Kantharia ND. Clinical success between tilted and axial implants in edentulous maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Jul–Sep;21(3):217–28. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_79_21.
• 11.Asawa N, Bulbule N, Kakade D, Shah R. Angulated implants: an alternative to bone augmentation and sinus lift procedure: systematic review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Mar;9(3):ZE10–3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11368.5655.
• 12.Walter L, Greenstein G. Utility of measuring anterior-posterior spread to determine distal cantilever length off a fixed implant-supported full-arch prosthesis: a review of the literature. J Am Dent Assoc. 2020 Oct;151(10):790–5. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2020.06.016.