Search Dental Tribune

Irrigating the root canal: A case report

Post-operative radiograph (Image: Dr Vittorio Franco, UK and Italy)
Dr Vittorio Franco, UK and Italy

Dr Vittorio Franco, UK and Italy

Mon. 22. January 2018

save

The patient reported on in this article is a student in dentistry and his parents are both dentists. They referred their son to a good endodontist, who then referred the case to me. As always, peers are more than welcome in either of my practices, in Rome and London, so when I treated this case, I had three dentists watching me, a future dentist on the chair, placing a great deal of pressure on me.

The 22-year-old male patient had a history of trauma to his maxillary incisors and arrived at my practice with symptoms related to tooth #21. The tooth, opened in an emergency by the patient’s mother, was tender when prodded, with a moderate level of sensitivity on the respective buccal gingiva. Sensitivity tests were negative for the other central incisor (tooth #12 was positive), and a periapical radiograph showed radiolucency in the periapical areas of both of the central incisors. The apices of these teeth were quite wide and the length of teeth appeared to exceed 25 mm.

My treatment plan was as follows: root canal therapy with two apical plugs with a calcium silicate-based bioactive cement. The patient provided his consent for the treatment of the affected tooth and asked to have the other treated in a subsequent visit.

After isolating with a rubber dam, I removed the temporary filling, and then the entire pulp chamber roof with a low-speed round drill. The working length was immediately evaluated using an electronic apex locator and a 31 mm K-type file. The working length was determined to be 28 mm.

As can be seen in the photographs, the canal was actually quite wide, so I decided to only use an irrigating solution and not a shaping instrument. Root canals are usually shaped so that there will be enough space for proper irrigation and a proper shape for obturation. This usually means giving these canals a tapered shape to ensure good control when obturating. With open apices, a conical shape is not needed, and often there is enough space for placing the irrigating solution deep and close to the apex.

I decided to use only some syringes containing 5 per cent sodium hypochlorite and EDDY, a sonic tip produced by VDW, for delivery of the cleaning solution and to promote turbulence in the endodontic space and shear stress on the canal walls in order to remove the necrotic tissue faster and more effectively. After a rinse with sodium hypochlorite, the sonic tip was moved to and from the working length of the canal for 30 seconds. This procedure was repeated until the sodium hypochlorite seemed to become ineffective, was clear and had no bubbles. I did not use EDTA, as no debris or smear layer was produced.

I suctioned the sodium hypochlorite, checked the working length with a paper point and then obturated the canal with a of 3 mm in thickness plug of bioactive cement. I then took a radiograph before obturating the rest of the canal with warm gutta-percha. I used a compomer as a temporary filling material.

The symptoms resolved, so I conducted the second treatment only after some months, when the tooth #11 became tender. Tooth #21 had healed. I performed the same procedure and obtained the same outcome (the four-month follow-up radiograph showed healing).

Editorial note: A complete list of references are available from the publisher. This article was published in roots - international magazine of endodontology No. 04/2017.

One thought on “Irrigating the root canal: A case report

  1. The ultimate reason why root canals fail is bacteria. If our mouths were sterile there would be no decay or infection, and damaged teeth could, in ways, repair themselves. So although we can attribute nearly all root canal failure to the presence of bacteria, I will discuss five common reasons why root canals fail, and why at least four of them are mostly preventable.

To post a reply please login or register

Wearable oral biosensor detects inflammation in real time

Intra-oral biosensors have the potential to enhance preventive oral care and significantly improve dental treatment outcomes. (Image: HENADZY/Adobe Stock)

Wed. 1. April 2026

save

COLLEGE STATION, Texas, US: A new intra-oral biosensor developed in the US could transform how periodontal disease is detected and monitored. Aiming to help shift dentistry toward proactive disease monitoring, researchers at Texas A&M University in College Station have developed an intra-oral patch capable of detecting inflammatory biomarkers. Following successful testing, they say that the device establishes feasibility of effective point-of-care monitoring in the challenging oral cavity environment.

The biosensor is contained in a wearable patch and designed to continuously monitor the levels of target biomarkers within the oral cavity. Adhering directly to oral soft tissue, it targets the tumour necrosis factor alpha protein associated with inflammation and oral disease progression.

The performance of the biosensor was evaluated through in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo tests, which demonstrated effective adhesion, stable function in simulated dynamic oral conditions, and high sensitivity in detecting and quantifying the targeted protein. Study results demonstrated detection limits far below those typically detectable with conventional diagnostic methods.

Co-developer of the device Dr Chenglin Wu, associate professor in the Zachry Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, explained in a university press release that the biosensor’s high sensitivity is achieved via a sensor surface engineered to detect very small amounts of the target protein, while a filtering layer helps prevent interference from other molecules in the oral environment. Dr Wu said: “For context, a patient with a viral infection might show symptoms at ten million or one billion virus copies per millilitre. Our sensor could detect 100 to 150 per millilitre.”

This sensitivity is supported by a hydrogel that provides robust adhesion. Dr Shaoting Lin, assistant professor at the Michigan State University College of Engineering, who collaborated with Dr Wu in developing the sensor, said in the press release: “Sensing measurements can be significantly influenced by the dynamic movement of tissues. A more robust tissue bond allows for a more reliable sensing performance independent of the strain.”

In their study, the researchers summarised: “Collectively, these findings establish the feasibility of real time in situ monitoring of inflammatory cytokines in the oral cavity and underscore the sensor’s potential for [point-of-care] diagnostics and personalised healthcare. Looking ahead, we aim to evaluate its clinical efficacy through expanded trials further, advancing its integration into routine dental practice and broader community health monitoring platforms.”

Although further validation in human clinical trials is required, the findings suggest broad potential applications. If successfully translated into clinical practice, such biosensors could significantly improve treatment outcomes, reduce healthcare costs and enhance patient engagement in preventive oral healthcare.

The article, titled “Tissue-adhesive hydrogel–MXene biosensor for in situ intraoral TNF-α detection”, was published online in the 16 January 2026 issue of Science Advances.

Topics:
Tags:
To post a reply please login or register
advertisement
advertisement