Search Dental Tribune

Irrigating the root canal: A case report

Post-operative radiograph (Image: Dr Vittorio Franco, UK and Italy)
Dr Vittorio Franco, UK and Italy

Dr Vittorio Franco, UK and Italy

Mon. 22. January 2018

save

The patient reported on in this article is a student in dentistry and his parents are both dentists. They referred their son to a good endodontist, who then referred the case to me. As always, peers are more than welcome in either of my practices, in Rome and London, so when I treated this case, I had three dentists watching me, a future dentist on the chair, placing a great deal of pressure on me.

The 22-year-old male patient had a history of trauma to his maxillary incisors and arrived at my practice with symptoms related to tooth #21. The tooth, opened in an emergency by the patient’s mother, was tender when prodded, with a moderate level of sensitivity on the respective buccal gingiva. Sensitivity tests were negative for the other central incisor (tooth #12 was positive), and a periapical radiograph showed radiolucency in the periapical areas of both of the central incisors. The apices of these teeth were quite wide and the length of teeth appeared to exceed 25 mm.

My treatment plan was as follows: root canal therapy with two apical plugs with a calcium silicate-based bioactive cement. The patient provided his consent for the treatment of the affected tooth and asked to have the other treated in a subsequent visit.

After isolating with a rubber dam, I removed the temporary filling, and then the entire pulp chamber roof with a low-speed round drill. The working length was immediately evaluated using an electronic apex locator and a 31 mm K-type file. The working length was determined to be 28 mm.

As can be seen in the photographs, the canal was actually quite wide, so I decided to only use an irrigating solution and not a shaping instrument. Root canals are usually shaped so that there will be enough space for proper irrigation and a proper shape for obturation. This usually means giving these canals a tapered shape to ensure good control when obturating. With open apices, a conical shape is not needed, and often there is enough space for placing the irrigating solution deep and close to the apex.

I decided to use only some syringes containing 5 per cent sodium hypochlorite and EDDY, a sonic tip produced by VDW, for delivery of the cleaning solution and to promote turbulence in the endodontic space and shear stress on the canal walls in order to remove the necrotic tissue faster and more effectively. After a rinse with sodium hypochlorite, the sonic tip was moved to and from the working length of the canal for 30 seconds. This procedure was repeated until the sodium hypochlorite seemed to become ineffective, was clear and had no bubbles. I did not use EDTA, as no debris or smear layer was produced.

I suctioned the sodium hypochlorite, checked the working length with a paper point and then obturated the canal with a of 3 mm in thickness plug of bioactive cement. I then took a radiograph before obturating the rest of the canal with warm gutta-percha. I used a compomer as a temporary filling material.

The symptoms resolved, so I conducted the second treatment only after some months, when the tooth #11 became tender. Tooth #21 had healed. I performed the same procedure and obtained the same outcome (the four-month follow-up radiograph showed healing).

Editorial note: A complete list of references are available from the publisher. This article was published in roots - international magazine of endodontology No. 04/2017.

One thought on “Irrigating the root canal: A case report

  1. The ultimate reason why root canals fail is bacteria. If our mouths were sterile there would be no decay or infection, and damaged teeth could, in ways, repair themselves. So although we can attribute nearly all root canal failure to the presence of bacteria, I will discuss five common reasons why root canals fail, and why at least four of them are mostly preventable.

To post a reply please login or register

Researchers develop patient-specific dental implants

A new interdisciplinary research project is working towards developing implants uniquely tailored for each individual patient. (Image: KWstudio/Adobe Stock)

Thu. 12. March 2026

save

HANNOVER, Germany: Researchers in Germany are developing customised dental implants designed to match each patient’s individual jaw structure. The approach combines computer modelling with advanced 3D printing to create implants that distribute masticatory forces more effectively. Scientists believe that the technology could improve long-term stability and reduce the risk of implant failure.

To address some of the reasons for implant failure, researchers at Hannover Medical School and its engineering partners in the interdisciplinary research unit FOR 5250 are developing new implant designs. FOR 5250 involves seven institutions in Germany and brings together experts from medicine, engineering and materials science. In late 2025, the German Research Foundation extended funding for the unit by four years, providing €4.4 million to continue the research.

Unlike the designs of off-the-shelf implants, the new designs are created using computer simulations that model the mechanical stresses generated during chewing. By analysing these forces before manufacturing, the researchers can optimise the implant’s internal architecture to reduce stress concentrations in the surrounding bone and improve long-term stability.

The implants are produced using 3D printing, which allows highly detailed structures to be built layer by layer according to digital specifications. This approach enables the production of implants whose internal structure varies in different regions, allowing them to be adapted to variations in bone density and mechanical load within the jaw.

Surface design is also an important focus of the project. After printing, the implants are treated with mechanical and chemical processes such as sand-blasting and etching to promote the attachment of osteoblasts. Researchers are also developing magnesium-based coatings that may enhance osseointegration while simultaneously inhibiting bacterial colonisation and biofilm formation.

The team is now exploring how the technology could benefit patients with reduced bone density, including many older adults. Although further research is required before clinical use, the researchers hope that the personalised approach will eventually enable safer and longer-lasting dental implant therapy.

Topics:
Tags:
To post a reply please login or register
advertisement
advertisement